Quote (TiStuff @ Dec 22 2022 08:26am)
lol you mean you couldnt/wouldnt answer it. I always like how you spin the chit. kinda brightens my day sometimes.
looks like yesterday they had their first day in court. I saw some high lights from salty crackers live stream it was a little interesting.
https://seed125.bitchute.com/oP6Dc58E9A0I/210TXvfpRbCh.mp4
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-courts-election/fact-check-courts-have-dismissed-multiple-lawsuits-of-alleged-electoral-fraud-presented-by-trump-campaign-idUSKBN2AF1G1Quote
Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President Donald Trump and his allies challenging the election or its outcome.
Quote
Similarly, on Dec. 12, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a long-shot lawsuit by the state of Texas and backed by Trump, which sought to throw out voting results in four states ( here ). In a brief order, the justices said Texas did not have legal standing to bring the case.
On Dec. 1, then-Attorney General William Barr said that the Justice Department had found no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the election, even as President Trump kept up his legal efforts to reverse his defeat ( here ). Two weeks later, Barr announced his resignation from the Trump administration ( here ).
the US supreme court itself rejected the case after looking at the lack of evidence. but many of them were given court time, Rudi and his team, rather than presenting solid evidence, brought forth witnesses who mostly presented hearsay or "look fishy" statements. no tampered ballots, no voting machine experts, etc.
none of the 50+ cases went anywhere, many of them in areas Trump appointed the judge who dismissed them.