Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 20 Oct 2022 07:06)
Ahh man. It's so close to self awareness
What's your point? First, I was never one of the guys who believed Trump to be infallible. I was always aware of the fact that he's a deeply flawed guy; I was just willing to put up with his bullshit for a long time out of a certain political calculus. Moreover, I "turned" on Trump as soon as he had outlived his usefulness. Second, I have never claimed to be immune to the mechanism I just described. In fact, I'm on the record admitting that I defended Trump for a longer timespan and to a larger degree than he objectively deserved.
If you're looking for a guy who is on board with his own side's arguments and talking points all the damn time while thinking of himself as immune to propaganda, you will find him by a look in the mirror.
Quote (IceMage @ 20 Oct 2022 10:25)
It doesn't make a lot of sense that Genesis was intended to be an accurate scientific history of the creation of the universe. In fact, there's two different creation timelines in Genesis. There's books in the Bible that are meant to be historical accounts, like the Gospels, and other books that aren't. The Bible is a library of books, containing different genres.
Early Christians like Irenaeus and Origen believed in an allegorical interpretation of Genesis, long before contemporary science.
Now, atheists or agnostics will not be convinced of these arguments, but that's because they don't have good reasons for believing what they do. And they have bad reasons for disbelieving Christianity.
I wasn't calling out mainstream Christians, only the creatonists who had first retconned the Bible into a book to be taken literally, but then backpedaled to a position of "intelligent design" when faced with overwhelming evidence against this interpretation.
