Quote (ownyaah @ 31 Jul 2022 07:46)
Usually these types of states is just playing both, or all sides for maximum gain. The Us is trying to use vietnam/india as a counterweight to china, but thats never gonna work because when push comes to shove all pretenses are erased.
It is same with belarus, for many years their position and stance was sorta dubious and flip floppy because they were kinda sorta playing both sides but also not really, so when push came to shove they showed they are 100% aligned with russia.
Vietnamese people/gov hate japanese the most, then china/us. They are very friendly towards russia. But when it boils down to it, being against china is too much of a headache and it is far more preferable economically to just align with them.
As much as Vietnam doesn't like China in quite a number of ways, they would rather have a working and trading relationship with China.
Both the US and China have started war with Vietnam.
Th US did it to fight of the Northern Viet Communist and the Chinese did it in respond to Vietnam's invasion of Cambodia.
Fast forward to our current time. Russia acts as a peace maker in a sense between Vietnam and China, like how she acts as a peace maker between China and India.
Are there going to be border clashes between the Chinese and Vietnam and India in future? Probably, but those are not exactly serious enough to wreck relationship.
Further more Vietnam belongs to Asean. A naked aggression from China to Vietnam and the entire Asean will respond.
At the moment, all of us in South East Asia knows exactly what the United States wants. We are not falling for it. We want to maintain our relationship with China and the US at the same time.
Just don't make us choose sides. If we do the US is going to lose out on this.