The ability to defend oneself IS a divine right. I'm so sorry for the world that you and your ancestors felt differently.

l2r, my post is about unrestricted access to guns, not the right to defend yourself. it's one of those lazy and disingenuous misdirections brainless NRA drones make...
i'm sorry for those kids that idiots are too dumb to distinguish one from the other, and too arrogant to overthink their moronic position:

I'm neither interested in your backpedal, nor care to consider it a difference.

I don't think it's a lazy argument at all actually. School shooters will simply use handguns like they've done in the past (see VA tech). Why do you think a mass shooter would change his mind given the prevalence of handguns? On one hand, rifles have higher velocity and the NATO round is particularly vicious to internal organs because it's small enough where it won't go through you. On the other hand, handguns are much easier to use in close quarters, you can carry several in case your primary weapon jams, etc. Frankly, if you're going to commit a mass shooting, you should use your rifle to hit targets from over 30 feet away and use a handgun for the rest.

In terms of lethality, the aspect that the weapon is semi-automatic is the primary driver. I think the primary discussion needs to revolve around the regulation of semi-automatic weapons and how we can come up with solutions that are in line with current case law. Personally, I'd love to bring the hammer down on all the thugs and hillbillies who have illegal guns. Illegal gun owners constitute the vast majority of all gun crime in this country. Let's give them a life sentence for simply possessing a gun. Right now, the sentences are REALLY light: https://www.cga.ct.gov/2012/rpt/2012-R-0345.htm

At the same time, we really need to figure out a better way of vetting people. Should we create HIPAA exemptions for the purchase of a gun? Should we allow law enforcement to browse your internet history? What sort of solutions do you have in mind?

why does god hate school children?

your inability to read correctly and make an honest reply is not a "backpedal" on my part. your inability to distinguish obvious differences and even the context of the very society you live in, does not make your stance any less moronic. also, didn't you at one point claim you're an atheist or something? or was that just to hide how your anti-choice stance is clearly religiously motivated bullshit?

Because they aren't allowed to pray there. Notice how children don't die in a church, only Protestants do.

Mass shootings went down over 45% after the AWB. When it expired mass shootings went up 250%.

Math says it worked.

"Bans don't work" says the guy trying to ban abortion lol. Talking out of both sides of your mouth here.




School children and fags

They're just saving them from CRT.




Priests aren't necrophiliac ffs, they want a pulse.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 27 2022 02:03pm

the only people allowed to prey in schools are trans groomers, it is known.

Probably the same reason He hates Jews.



I can't read your intent, I can only read your words. I read your words just fine. And not an inability to see a difference, an absence of caring to do so. I don't even know why you engage, really.