Quote (Subwoofer @ Apr 23 2022 01:01pm)
"Disney public stance is a veiled threat at campaign contributions"
He did it because disney wasn't going to give him money anymore. Then you say it's about the citizens. READ YOUR OWN WORDS.
He did it because it was the will of the people and Disney isn't going to give him money because they are trying to apply pressure on politicians to basically ignore the people and instead do what's PC and mainstream. That's the correct sequence, again i'm not really sure where you are struggling with the understanding.
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 23 2022 01:03pm)
Doesn't matter if Disney flat out said they were changing their campaign contributions. That's protected speech and the government isn't allowed to single out somebody for that.
This is the world you and other conservatives fought for. Unlimited corporate rights.
Corporations threatening politicians to do the 'right thing' isn't free speech. It's legit telling politicians, do this or we will fund your opposition. Literally the opposite of democracy.
This post was edited by ofthevoid on Apr 23 2022 11:07am