d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Jussie Smolett
Prev13456718Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 10 2021 12:17am
Quote (Sioux @ Dec 10 2021 08:13am)
Sorry that people on the left have sympathy for people who've been the victim of hate crimes


Except Juicy is not a victim of hate crime. Leftist trash reflexively defended a fellow left-leaning turd without any proof of victimhood except for hearsay.

Quote (Sioux @ Dec 10 2021 08:13am)
Got any good pictures of Jussie with a major democrat?


LOL

Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Dec 10 2021 12:19am
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Dec 9 2021 10:17pm)
Except Juicy is not a victim of hate crime. Leftist trash reflexively defended a fellow left-leaning turd without any proof of victimhood except for hearsay.



LOL

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03/26/18/11487398-6852713-image-m-45_1553624621852.jpg


After the allegations came to light?
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 10 2021 12:20am
Quote (Sioux @ Dec 10 2021 08:19am)
After the allegations came to light?

Member
Posts: 6,701
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
Dec 10 2021 12:20am
Quote (Sioux @ Dec 10 2021 01:10am)
Sorry for thinking it's fucked up a guy went to campaign for republican senators before going home to jerk it to toddler snuff porn.

Guess we have different sense of morality. You care about a media hoax, I care about the safety of children.



Sorry I forgot you are one of those who acts like you didn’t read what I say. If I remembered your style of conversation I would not have engaged.

Anyways it was a congressman not a senator. And as far as I can see it was just that one. But I mean yeah this means all republicans are pedophiles or something right? Clinton went to st. James island several times, does that mean all democrats are pedophiles or whatever? Come on dude be serious.

Anyways can you name a single media outlet which covered the recent report of multiple CIA agents having their sex crimes not even brought to trial under the guise of “methods may be exposed”? Including one agent caught with thousands of child porn things while he was on assignment?

Does that indicate they are okay with pedophilia? Or does it indicate that they just didn’t know about, or just chose not to cover the story? I could compile some ridiculous grand scheme from that, but I am not a complete moron and can see that it just didn’t get covered by pretty much anybody.

This post was edited by WickedDarkJuggalos on Dec 10 2021 12:21am
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Dec 10 2021 12:21am
Quote (WickedDarkJuggalos @ Dec 9 2021 10:20pm)
Sorry I forgot you are one of those who acts like you didn’t read what I say. If I remembered your style of conversation I would not have engaged.

Anyways it was a congressman not a senator. And as far as I can see it was just that one. But I mean yeah this means all republicans are pedophiles or something right? Clinton went to st. James island several times, does that mean all democrats are pedophiles or whatever? Come on dude be serious.

Anyways can you name a single media outlet which covered the recent report of multiple CIA agents having their sex crimes not even brought to trial? Including one agent caught with thousands of child porn things while he was on assignment?

Does that indicate they are okay with pedophilia? Or does it indicate that they just didn’t know about, or just chose not to cover the story? I could compile some ridiculous grand scheme from that, but I am not a complete moron and can see that it just didn’t get covered by pretty much anybody.


You're really working the pro-pedophile spin. What does that say about you
Member
Posts: 6,701
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 1,565.74
Warn: 30%
Dec 10 2021 12:22am
Quote (Sioux @ Dec 10 2021 01:21am)
You're really working the pro-pedophile spin. What does that say about you



Okay I am just done with you now. Go talk to sunny trailer park kid or tstuff if you want to have stupid fucking conversations.
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Dec 10 2021 12:22am
Quote (WickedDarkJuggalos @ Dec 9 2021 10:22pm)
Okay I am just done with you now. Go talk to sunny trailer park kid or tstuff if you want to have stupid fucking conversations.


Honestly I thought you were TIStuff
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Dec 10 2021 12:23am
The so-called right seems to hate the fact that mass media is for-profit and pushes stories that drive click-throughs, ad views, likes, comments, and subscriptions.

Hey, I agree. The left has been fighting against the regulatory changes that have created these issues for decades.

Capitalism, once again, is the root of the problem.

https://journalistsresource.org/media/covering-america-journalism-professor-christopher-daly/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine

https://www.businessinsider.com/fcc-passes-media-ownership-regulations-rules-2017-11

Go learn. And stop letting them control you. Whether you’re literally cumming over the prospects of an actor going to jail for exploiting identity politics for profit, or having an aneurism because some alt right neckbeard in his mother’s basement is literally cumming over the prospects of an actor exploiting identity politics for profit going to prison, your thoughts are owned by capitalists who cash in on every emotion they can squeeze out of you. Stop being a slave.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Dec 10 2021 12:25am
Member
Posts: 12,978
Joined: Apr 28 2008
Gold: 6.66
Dec 10 2021 01:11am
Quote (WickedDarkJuggalos @ 9 Dec 2021 21:46)
They covered that trial extensively as well. The Arbery case is a fantastic example of almost every news outlet covering absolute lies while successfully fueling the race narrative, intentionally leaving out known facts about the incident to let the public believe a fake story >_> There is already a topic for that one though. All that public pressure ended up, in my opinion and many others, getting two people convicted of murder when at most they committed false imprisonment. Irresponsible coverage at it’s finest.


Jesus christ I was thinking for a second you could be relatively reasonable. Looks like they didn't cover it until the damning video evidence came out.
Member
Posts: 3,046
Joined: Oct 1 2021
Gold: 1,979.01
Dec 10 2021 01:37am
Leftists, I want to offer you some advice...

I started this thread as a rather obvious trap and you took it hook line sinker. This guy is so obviously a fraud and is guilty of multiple things, and the vast majority of people hold this opinion. Yet... here you are, circling the wagons. You just CANNOT be objective about anything, can you? Why should anyone listen to anything you say?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13456718Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll