Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 28 2021 10:15am)

"a little hyperbolic" is a little backtrack from "overblown".

You attacked the factual coverage of the film, doing so you put forth defense of the film. I called you out on this, asked "overblown how?" - all you could come up with were the following "trash arguments" & "strawman bullshit":

1) "Coverage .. implied that it was going to be something pedofiles would flock to"
2) "masturbate"
3) "Streisand effect"

Yes, they did flock.
Yes ofcourse they pleasured themselves
Streisand effect - great thing since people now know the facts thanks to it.
Also the crap about ratings being removed from netflix website - nobody cares, we have rotten tomatoes.

You dont present any further defense of your "trash arguments", rightfully so, they were pathetic. This resulted in you backtracking from "overblown" to "a little hyperbolic", but in the end you could prove neither. Coverage was fully justified.

Also from what i remember, you did not say anything closely resembling "the movie should not exist" at the time of its release. You claim the opposite? OK then.

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 28 2021 06:19pm)

now we're doing literary analysis on the difference between hyperbole and overblown.

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 28 2021 05:46pm)

a little hyperbolic.

Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 28 2021 10:33am)

Adding "little" alone already signifies backtracking. But since you failed to prove any "hyperbole" or anything "overblown" occured, we can skip the analysis.

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 28 2021 06:36pm)

i "failed to prove" that my opinion it was "overblown" was true (opinions arent facts), because its your opinion that the streisand effect was good, and we agree the effect happened.

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 28 2021 06:36pm)

i win?

Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 28 2021 10:44am)

i presented the facts on why streisand effect was good, still waiting for any sloppy examples of why it might not be



mission: dont let this "win" scar you for life any more than you already have been by me
(impossible)

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 28 2021 06:51pm)

u said it was good, because its good, and now people "know the facts". your facts on why its good are literally that its good and that people know facts.

u asked me to prove an opinion, i told you its my opinion, and u cant pause.

i come into conversations with you knowing this, just like u come in fervently trying to dunk on me. only one of us is trying tho.

Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 28 2021 10:57am)

I will try to converse as though i were engaging with an invalid:

Streisand effect sent the >>fact<< across - that left-wing Netflix greenlit a softcore child porn film as though it was normal.

Streisand effect good

Please provide any sloppy examples why you think Streisand effect bad.

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 28 2021 07:04pm)

so you say normalization is bad, but that same Streisand effect caused many left wing sympathizers to not only watch the trash film but then also defend it due to polarization in politics, further normalizing it. it's not more normal than it was, and more accepted by lefties than it was.

you and i can agree, in our opinions, that this is gross of lefties to do. but in facts, its more normalized. correct?

Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 28 2021 11:15am)

incorrect, leftist echo chamber coming out in blind support simply out of spite was an optics catastrophe

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 28 2021 11:19am)

now we're doing literary analysis on the difference between hyperbole and overblown. u really dont have a reverse or park gear in you, huh?