Go your own way brothers!

Women have healthier eggs when they are younger, from 20 to about early 30s. Beyond that they run really increased risks of birth defects.

What good are your healthy eggs if you raise a shitty child? Surely, there's a balance to be struck. Doctors are only concerned about conceiving once you're 35 or over and even then the risk is quite minimal. I think having your first child somewhere between 32-33 is ideal.

IMO, it's better to grow up with a severe birth defect than to raise a child with under $250K household income. You can have a wonderful, healthy life with a birth defect. The probability of you becoming a net drain on society if you come from a household below $250K is like 95% or something like that.

250k? Where did you get that number from? I am not doubting you but 250K is a lot of money. A lot of people I know don't make that as couples.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Oct 11 2021 07:15pm

women have like 90% of their fertile eggs gone by age 30

the important parts are a stable father and a two parent household, married or not does not really matter imo

rofl those 250k, you describe less than 5% of the population in the states with that

Not really. Birth defects do go up, but not by much. You're looking at the difference between a 0.1% birth defect rate and a 0.5% birth defect rate. Yeah, "THERE'S 5 TIMES AS MANY BIRTH DEFECTS", but it's still a really small number. The advantages massively outweigh the risk.

meanwhile is breeding with black women

It's not that much lol. Let's say for the sake of argument that a woman's menstruation cycle starts at age 12. If 90% are gone by 30, you're telling me she'll be barren at age 32? That's nonsense.

i do believe this fellow is a hero to some


This post was edited by duffman316 on Oct 11 2021 09:11pm

it is that much, check the stats anf dont blame me for biological facts

fertility drops massively around age 30 for women