d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Cowardice In Politics On Full Display
Prev13456711Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,022
Joined: Oct 9 2009
Gold: 5,790.00
Jul 14 2021 06:51pm
Sorry guys but this shit has been going on for years on both sides. Nothing new here
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 14 2021 07:13pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 13 2021 07:07am)
https://nypost.com/2021/07/13/texas-gov-abbott-vows-to-have-missing-dem-lawmakers-arrested/

This type of behavior is in no way practiced by just one side, this is an act we've seen repeated over and over by both sides.

Fleeing votes, a similar case in Wisconsin comes to mind where democrats fled a vote by Scott Walker as governor, and later the Republicans fled a vote under Evers the democratic governor.

In the federal legislature we have poor attendance even on typical legislative votes, and ABYSMAL attendance when bills are being read in their entirety.

If this is your job you should be ready and able to vote, attend meetings, attend readings, etc 5 days a week. Minimum. Monday through Friday 8-10 hours a day.

If you have official business back in your district or scheduled vacation there should be a robust proxy voting system in play.

To me, this is a strategic abuse of the rules and nothing more. This isn't any worse than a filibuster IMO.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 14 2021 10:16am)
Get rid of these quorum laws. If you’re not there to vote or debate, tough, the bill or law one side is pushing moves on.

Problem solved.


Yea, that's not short-sighted at all :wacko:
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 14 2021 07:22pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 14 2021 08:13pm)
To me, this is a strategic abuse of the rules and nothing more. This isn't any worse than a filibuster IMO.

Yea, that's not short-sighted at all :wacko:


More or less.

I see this as strategic retreat rather than tucking tail and running

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jul 14 2021 07:22pm
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Jul 14 2021 07:33pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 14 2021 09:13pm)
To me, this is a strategic abuse of the rules and nothing more. This isn't any worse than a filibuster IMO.



Yea, that's not short-sighted at all :wacko:



What’s the downside of getting rid of them? They’re obviously getting abused.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 14 2021 07:44pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 14 2021 06:33pm)
What’s the downside of getting rid of them? They’re obviously getting abused.


Because it would allow a fringe minority to do some pretty horrific things. Imagine if Republicans are at the convention and Democrats pass a liberal wish-list, impeach and remove the governor, etc. Imagine a small portion of the board of directors dissolving a company while everyone is sleeping. Quorum was invented in the middle ages precisely to prevent that sort of shit from happening.

What's happening now is certainly an abuse of parliamentary procedure, but it's far far better than the alternative.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 14 2021 08:00pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 14 2021 08:33pm)
What’s the downside of getting rid of them? They’re obviously getting abused.


Gotta think in the long term. Get rid of it now and you dont get to use it in the future.

If you're okay with that risk then get rid of it.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Jul 14 2021 08:43pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 14 2021 09:44pm)
Because it would allow a fringe minority to do some pretty horrific things. Imagine if Republicans are at the convention and Democrats pass a liberal wish-list, impeach and remove the governor, etc. Imagine a small portion of the board of directors dissolving a company while everyone is sleeping. Quorum was invented in the middle ages precisely to prevent that sort of shit from happening.

What's happening now is certainly an abuse of parliamentary procedure, but it's far far better than the alternative.



Yeah no, an elected majority would get its way. What the democrats are doing now in this case is a minority essentially stalling the will of the majority through a technicality, again completely counter democracy.

It’s not about gotcha voting in the middle of the night to basically trick the other side, these are votes/sessions known well in advance and planned for. If you can’t make it there’s video conferencing, there’s other means but we both know this is happening purely out of political reasons.

As it stands these laws are garbage and you could easily fix them with a few clauses.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 14 2021 09:49pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 14 2021 07:43pm)
Yeah no, an elected majority would get its way. What the democrats are doing now in this case is a minority essentially stalling the will of the majority through a technicality, again completely counter democracy.

It’s not about gotcha voting in the middle of the night to basically trick the other side, these are votes/sessions known well in advance and planned for. If you can’t make it there’s video conferencing, there’s other means but we both know this is happening purely out of political reasons.

As it stands these laws are garbage and you could easily fix them with a few clauses.


You said you wanted to get rid of quorum entirely which is obviously foolish. Perhaps you support adjusting quorum to a simple majority? I guess the question you need to answer is, "what percentage of people need to be present in a given body for a vote to count?"

As someone who has conservative leanings, I think it's better to have the ability to block legislation than to have the ability to quickly pass legislation. I would support adjusting quorum to a simple majority since almost every state has that requirement. I don't know why Texas has a supermajority quorum requirement.
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jul 14 2021 09:59pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 15 2021 12:43pm)
Yeah no, an elected majority would get its way. What the democrats are doing now in this case is a minority essentially stalling the will of the majority through a technicality, again completely counter democracy.

It’s not about gotcha voting in the middle of the night to basically trick the other side, these are votes/sessions known well in advance and planned for. If you can’t make it there’s video conferencing, there’s other means but we both know this is happening purely out of political reasons.

As it stands these laws are garbage and you could easily fix them with a few clauses.


You guys literally love the electoral college BECAUSE it lets your minority maintain power, but you HATE when you have a majority and anything is done to prevent it doing horrible things.
You want real democracy?
Fine..
The democrats run the country, forever.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Jul 14 2021 09:59pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jul 14 2021 10:52pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ 14 Jul 2021 23:59)
You guys literally love the electoral college BECAUSE it lets your minority maintain power, but you HATE when you have a majority and anything is done to prevent it doing horrible things.
You want real democracy?
Fine..
The democrats run the country, forever
.

great..gonna love when the individual mandate is being used to justify why i have to abide by “separate but equal” facilities and goods and services like my ancestors did
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13456711Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll