d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Conservative Cancel Culture 3
Prev1345679Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 629Replies: 80Track Topic
Member
Posts: 30,151
Joined: Nov 26 2004
Gold: 348.69
#41
Jun 30 2021 07:33am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Jun 30 2021 08:27am)
You're just addressing the person and not the argument now. I think there's a term for that...


Oh I decided to put etiquette aside since you're never going to debate on an equal footing. Please see sig.
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
#42
Jun 30 2021 07:34am
Quote (addone @ Jun 30 2021 12:37am)
The original constitution did not use slaves/slavery and it avoided the subject. It had several provisions relating to "unfree" persons. Slavery existed there is no denying that but it has no implication of race.

Its the purple haired cucks who study critical race theory intentionally drawing conclusions to indoctrinate the marxist propaganda and try to strip away the foundations of America.

They can study it all they want and have their private circle jerks around their beloved communism all they like its just they don't deserve taxpayers (federal) money for funding. Which this bill is all about.
If you want to fund anti American propaganda great go ahead but leave me out.


you really should read about the the 3/5th's part of the constitution.. IF that isn't a racist statement, now wonder its so prevalent today.. some people cant even recognize it.
The agreement done by John Adams... you know they guy drafting the constitution.


“Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."

Although the Constitution did not refer directly to slaves, it did not ignore them entirely. Article one, section two of the Constitution of the United States declared that any person who was not free would be counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation. The "Three-Fifths Clause" thus increased the political power of slaveholding states. It did not, however, make any attempt to ensure that the interests of slaves would be represented in the government.

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Jun 30 2021 07:35am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#43
Jun 30 2021 07:35am
Actually, I think this thread might be more useful. The people who are honest are acknowledging the hypocrisy either here or on discord, and the bad-faith posters are using this as an opportunity to shine a massive spotlight on themselves. We're only missing a few of the most dishonest posters, but I imagine they'll show up sooner or later.
Member
Posts: 30,151
Joined: Nov 26 2004
Gold: 348.69
#44
Jun 30 2021 07:36am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Jun 30 2021 08:35am)
Actually, I think this thread might be more useful. The people who are honest are acknowledging the hypocrisy either here or on discord, and the bad-faith posters are using this as an opportunity to shine a massive spotlight on themselves. We're only missing a few of the most dishonest posters, but I imagine they'll show up sooner or later.


Anyone who disagrees with you is dishonest. Got it.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#45
Jun 30 2021 07:42am
Quote (Cannabist @ Jun 30 2021 08:36am)
Anyone who disagrees with you is dishonest. Got it.


Some things are so blatantly obvious it requires dishonesty to argue against.

The people in this thread arguing the negative are basically just flat-earthers

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jun 30 2021 07:43am
Member
Posts: 30,151
Joined: Nov 26 2004
Gold: 348.69
#46
Jun 30 2021 07:46am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Jun 30 2021 08:42am)
Some things are so blatantly obvious it requires dishonesty to argue against.

The people in this thread arguing the negative are basically just flat-earthers


If you're going to justify dishonesty then why would anyone take you seriously?
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
#47
Jun 30 2021 08:37am
Quote (Cannabist @ Jun 30 2021 08:14am)
If the United States of America and its Constitution are so bad and so racist how about everyone that doesn't like it just go fuck off to a country that's already a communist shithole.


If people don't like others trying to right historical wrongs and make America a better place for everyone, how about THEY go fuck off to a country that's already a authoritarian shithole?

I mean, FFS...this country was literally founded on the concept of people NOT fucking off to another country, and instead fighting to make life better here.

This post was edited by Surfpunk on Jun 30 2021 08:38am
Member
Posts: 30,151
Joined: Nov 26 2004
Gold: 348.69
#48
Jun 30 2021 08:38am
Quote (Surfpunk @ Jun 30 2021 09:37am)
If people don't like others trying to right historical wrongs and make America a better place for everyone, how about THEY go fuck off to a country that's already a authoritarian shithole?


No U
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
#49
Jun 30 2021 08:39am
Quote (Cannabist @ Jun 30 2021 09:38am)
No U


Solid argument.
Member
Posts: 30,151
Joined: Nov 26 2004
Gold: 348.69
#50
Jun 30 2021 08:43am
Quote (Surfpunk @ Jun 30 2021 09:39am)
Solid argument.


About as solid as anything offered by Thor
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1345679Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact