d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Anti Maskers
Prev13456712Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
Apr 4 2021 07:40pm
Quote (UmadLoL @ Apr 4 2021 08:19pm)
It’s not normal to enforce such stupid shit on the population when 99% are going to be just fine without a mask.


This but just do like most states + Canada + Uk do an don't wear one. Let the scared lil snowflakes wear one. Let them argue bout their pronouns alone. The sooner you just avoid their existence, the sooner it'll all go away.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 4 2021 07:47pm
Quote (UmadLoL @ 5 Apr 2021 02:42)
Fully vaccinated or not it doesn’t matter. 1 dose gives you 90% of the protection the vaccine can offer and every vaccine is over 90% efficiency as the labs have reported. You’re an idiot.



Really isn’t shit tbh. How many of them are just people in the vulnerable age range that refuse to get vaccinated?


funny how you ignored the question about what percentage of the population is vaccinated for you to suggest it's safe now. you're just a science-denying hack, lol. idiot.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 4 2021 07:49pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Apr 4 2021 06:45pm)
Being opposed to Banksters and government cops abusing the elderly by violently enforcing government mask mandates as part of year-long dystopian lockdown measures does not somehow make me not a libertarian.

Even stripped of that important context, libertarians do not have to like and defend every action by a private business. Thats a misrepresentation.

Thor with the dishonest and nuance-free bad takes like usual.


Literally you defend businesses right to exclude people from their business for any reason.

If a business does not want to associate with this woman why are they not within their right to remove her from their property if she refuses to leave?

Quote (cambovenzi @ Apr 4 2021 07:21pm)
I agree there is that element to the story, but as I have explained and will explain further its more complicated than that.
-Ridiculous Mask mandates as a result of government policies.
-Government created and subsidized Bank cartels unilaterally changing their terms to bar people from withdrawing their funds and closing their account.
-Agents of the state abusing and arresting elderly women at the behest of banksters.
None of this is ideal from a libertarian and human perspective.
Like I was saying, I can strongly disagree with actions of so-called private businesses and dislike some aspects of the story.
""It'S a PrIvAtE bUsInEsS" lacks any and all nuance.
We are 100% in support of private property rights but that doesn't mean we can't criticize private companies over their decisions. " -Libertarian Party of Kentucky
"It's a private company, yes. That doesn't mean I can't criticize their business practices and push for them to make changes. That doesn't mean I won't fight them to not censor views i disagree with. They can refuse. And I have a right to complain." - former LP presidential candidate Austin Petersen


I love how you apply this nuance to anti-maskers, but refuse to apply this nuance to literally any other case you've been asked over the years where it was a private business excluding people.

You didn't bring up government discrimination of gay people when the gay cake fiasco happened, you didn't bring up government enforced discrimination when asked about businesses excluding minorities.

Yet now you're full of nuance when it comes to somebody being refused to wear a mask.

You are a hack who refuses to apply your own principles when it's inconvenient. Nuace to you isn't something you use to make your opinion, as much as it's a weapon you try to use to bludgeon people rightly pointing out your hypocrisy.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Apr 4 2021 07:52pm
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
Apr 4 2021 07:54pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Apr 4 2021 08:49pm)
Literally you defend businesses right to exclude people from their business for any reason.

If a business does not want to associate with this woman why are they not within their right to remove her from their property if she refuses to leave?



I love how you apply this nuance to anti-maskers, but refuse to apply this nuance to literally any other case you've been asked over the years where it was a private business excluding people.

You didn't bring up government discrimination of gay people when the gay cake fiasco happened, you didn't bring up government enforced discrimination when asked about businesses excluding minorities.

Yet now you're full of nuance when it comes to somebody being refused to wear a mask.

You are a hack who refuses to apply your own principles when it's inconvenient. Nuace to you isn't something you use to make your opinion, as much as it's a weapon you try to use to bludgeon people rightly pointing out your hypocrisy.


Why would we listen to you. You went from being a person with high income to being someone living in the project. Then you ask us to trust your race? Prob just someone on meds juggling online to cope with a boring existence.

This post was edited by SunnyvaleTrailerPark on Apr 4 2021 07:55pm
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Apr 4 2021 08:07pm
Quote (SunnyvaleTrailerPark @ Apr 4 2021 09:54pm)
Why would we listen to you. You went from being a person with high income to being someone living in the project. Then you ask us to trust your race? Prob just someone on meds juggling online to cope with a boring existence.


You've made 2-3 multis in order to ban evade on a dead forum. You should follow your advice ASAP.
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
Apr 4 2021 08:08pm
Quote (kenw @ Apr 4 2021 09:07pm)
You've made 2-3 multis in order to ban evade on a dead forum. You should follow your advice ASAP.


Tell me more. You really care bout things that shouldn't be on your mind. We're online somewhere that doesn't exist outside our little boxes.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Apr 4 2021 08:11pm
There is absolutely nothing hypocritical or unprincipled about what I have said.
Come up with an actual argument against my points if you disagree.

Its not hypocritical to have different opinions about very different cases.
There are massive differences between mask mandates w/ police abuse of the elderly vs someone going out of their way to use government coercion to try to steal from and shut down a Christian bakery.

At no point in time did I come out against people being allowed to have an opinion about the actions of a business.

I won't waste more of my time with self-admitted bad faith actors who are lying about me to serve a personal vendetta. Find a new hobby, loser.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 4 2021 08:17pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Apr 4 2021 09:11pm)
There is absolutely nothing hypocritical or unprincipled about what I have said.
Come up with an actual argument against my points if you disagree.

Its not hypocritical to have different opinions about very different cases.
There are massive differences between mask mandates w/ police abuse of the elderly vs someone going out of their way to use government coercion to try to steal from and shut down a Christian bakery.

At no point in time did I come out against people being allowed to have an opinion about the actions of a business.

I won't waste more of my time with self-admitted bad faith actors who are lying about me to serve a personal vendetta. Find a new hobby, loser.


You're insisting on it not being hypocritical, so tell me why this business shouldn't have the right to remove this woman from the premesis. Youv'e argued multiple times in the past that a business should be able to exclude anybody for any reason no matter what.

This is not her not being allowed to have an opinion, this isn't the government mandating she wear a mask, this wasn't police abusing the elderly. This was a business exercising their right that you've argued they should have, and that you've gone out of your way to assert they should have without any restrictions.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Apr 4 2021 08:17pm
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Apr 4 2021 08:18pm
Quote (SunnyvaleTrailerPark @ Apr 4 2021 10:08pm)
Tell me more. You really care bout things that shouldn't be on your mind. We're online somewhere that doesn't exist outside our little boxes.


Lol, you shouldnt have exposed yourself. Whenevr you try to bellitle others, I'll always remind you of your own pitifulness. You guys do the same to Thor so let me reciprocate the favor. :)
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
Apr 4 2021 08:20pm
Quote (kenw @ Apr 4 2021 09:18pm)
Lol, you shouldnt have exposed yourself. Whenevr you try to bellitle others, I'll always remind you of your own pitifulness. You guys do the same to Thor so let me reciprocate the favor. :)


Belittle people? You shouldn't care what others think of you like i think nothing of other people. To me, if you sound stupid, chances are that your stupid. If you sound like a good person, chance i'll be aight with you and have normal online convos. At the end of the day, we're online and i could care less bout anyone but myself.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13456712Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll