Quote (Thor123422 @ 3 Feb 2021 00:14)
I mean, the world has had three nuclear incidents. Chernobyl which was decades ago under the USSR. Three Mile Island in which all of the safety steps worked perfectly, and Fukushima which required a tsunami and an earthquake at the same time to cause an issue.
Overall they've got a good record
Aye, agreed. Add on top of that thousands of worldwide nuclear weapons tests and a few dozen or even hundred *mostly* green reactors more or less aren't going to have an impact.
But... And it's a really hard BUT... Fear. How do you satisfy the citizens of Portland for example, that the reactor in their state, even if it's 200 miles away in the plains desert, isn't an immediate threat? Do they understand that the meltdown impact radius is likely less than a mile or two, assuming the 1 in 10 million odds against a meltdown rolls the wrong way?
I do not expect people to be reasonable.
This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Feb 3 2021 02:20am