Remorse: deep regret or guilt for a wrong committed.

Defending himself wasn't a wrong.

He said he didn't regret arming himself and that he acted in self defense.

People have jumped on that to say 'omg this murderer doesn't even show remorse'.

You can speak all you like.

End of the day Rittenhouse will spend a long time in prison and his life will be over or he won't spend a long time in prison and he will go the George Zimmerman route. Lets check in on George and see how hes... oh.

Do you have the mental capacity and integrity necessary to argue the points and try to justify your deranged fantasies about children committing suicide?

Whether or not he will spend a long time in prison or not is to be determined.
The evidence so far indicates he has a VERY strong self defense case.
Have you reviewed that evidence?

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Nov 21 2020 09:46pm

I have reviewed the evidence that is available in the public forum and, being prior law enforcement, my experience helps me come to.the conclusion that based on the video evidence I have seen Rittenhouse will not be successfully using the "self-defense" defense.

I know I may sound retarded in most of my posts but thats mainly because I have such a low.opinion of those I argue with on this forum that its not worth spending any extra energy to make a coherent argument. Makes even less sense when you Trumpers look evidence in the mouth and call it fake news.

The kid is going to prison. If he doesn't hes going to end up like Zimmerman. Better for him to out that gun in his mouth and pull the trigger and it saves the taxpayers some coin.

I understand the futility that comes with arguing against some of the people here.
I assure you i'm not one of the paste eaters.

What part makes you come to that conclusion and why?
Multiple videos and breakdowns I have seen show contained defense against clear assailants.

As well as the facts, the law also appears to be on his side.



His case easily satisfies both conditions.
Of course a more in depth dive into the laws is needed and will take place to sort out the various charges and try to lawyer slime their way into a conviction to appease the left. They demand child sacrifice.

Fantasizing about his suicide is very poor form, especially if and when he is innocent.

I am actually fine with kyle walking after killing the child abuser, he should be warned not to do it again though.

These things don't happen in a vacuum. Rittenhouse did not illegally obtain a firearm, cross state lines and murder someone without already having the intent. He saw an opportunity and he took it. More importantly though are his actions post-event. He could have called 911. He could have called for help. He didn't. He's going to prison. A jury will vote to convict. There are already several breakdowns of Wisconsin law by noted legal experts casting big shadows on Rittenhouses self-defense claim.

I'm glad you're not a paste eater. Looks like we get to have civil discussions

This post was edited by MizzouFTW on Nov 21 2020 10:47pm

might read this thread tomorrow
if it gets good enough

Much of this is objectively wrong.

There are multiple interviews, videos and pictures establishing a different intent.
He didn't cross state lines with the firearm, which wouldn't prove intent to murder anyways.
He only fired at people who were attacking him, as he is legally and morally able to do.
He is on video sticking around until someone told him to get out of there as a mob approached. One witness/reporter who gave first aid to the first attacker testified to this in multiple interviews.
He is on video calling someone almost immediately after it happened.
He purposefully fled toward police and stated he was doing so.

America is not the first episode of Vikings where you get the death penalty if you don't report a self defense incident before passing 3 houses.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Nov 21 2020 11:10pm