Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 12 2020 09:38pm)
Whats wrong with you?
They arent predatory in the best times because low unemployment drives up wages.
Read
The settlement is in—some of Silicon Valley’s biggest and most influential technology companies late last week agreed to pay $324.5 million to settle a class-action law suit brought by their employees alleging collusion to suppress their wages. After an anti-trust investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a complaint in September of 2010. The companies eventually settled with the department and stopped the practice. The targeted workers and the companies involved agreed to settle last month, with the amount announced last week.
But will there be any repercussions from this long legal tangle between employers and employees in one of the leading industries in the country? A great series of stories on Pando Daily lay bare the alleged efforts of big tech companies (including Apple Inc., Intel Corp., and Google Inc.) for a secret “do not hire” cartel deterring these companies from hiring each other’s workers, which artificially suppressed their workers’ wages. In the mid-2000s there was a high demand for programmers and engineers, which pushed up their wages. To combat higher pay, Apple’s Steve Jobs and Google’s Eric Schmidt allegedly agreed to stop trying to hire each other’s workers, using their size to pressure other firms to join them.
Yet some conservative economists, among them George Mason University economics professor Tyler Cowen on his popular Marginal Revolution blog, argue this kind of cartel is not terribly important because some firms will cheat, causing the system to fall apart, while new workers will figure out that there is a cartel and go work somewhere else for more money. But this particular case of wage collusion lasted from 2005 to 2009 and took the Justice Department to solve this problem, not the market.