Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 8 2020 09:06am)
Globalization is inevitable. A neoliberal take on globalization is not.
Currently, we're experiencing - like you say - a corporate take on globalization, one in which multinationals are unchecked and can pit wages, worker protection laws, environmental regulations and tax codes against each other, to create a global race to the bottom which in the long run only serves the top 0.1%. But it doesnt have to be this way.
Yes, some of the damage that's already been done might be irreversible - but most of the damage that would come in the future if we stay on this course can still be prevented. The election of Trump was, in a certain sense, a haphazard attempt at such a course correction. Didnt work out as well as I and many others had hoped for, but that's more due to his personal flaws and weaknesses than the underlying idea/platform being impossible.
Trump's anti-globalization plan comes from Stephen Miller, and is basically tariff everything until china taps out. it doesnt work in a 2 party system when China maintains power for decades and every 4-8 years the other party nukes all of your tariffs. china will just wait for biden or harris or whomever, then its business as usual.
it's like a wrench on a flat head. the tool could work but not in that application. the idea that it could ever work was not only silly but cost the American worker and consumer a bunch of cash for a 4-8 year symbolic attack on China as a campaign promise.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 8 2020 08:18am