Quote (Djunior @ Jul 17 2020 06:42am)
Who's going to pay for socialism?
You mean more socialized aspects instead of replacing the whole system, which is what I'm actually in favor of, but you don't care anyways because it's easier to just blanket everyone who wants change as a socialist?
To answer your question, however stupid and condescending, I'd say that the companies that try their hardest to not pay any taxes, by abusing loopholes in tax codes that always seem to change in favor of their business strategies, would finally have to pay their fair share like normal people have to do. When the gargantuan amounts of revenue are finally at the disposal of the institution responsible for ensuring the general well-being of people via healthcare and protections that are workforce related, I'd say that would significantly increase work to life balance and over time. Maybe even join most other first world allied countries in the trend of longer life and earlier retirement.
Would that be okay with you? Longer life and early retirement?
Is it too much to ask that you become cognizant of actual problems instead of blanketing any force attempting to change the current trend of decreasing life expectancy and an ever-increasing amount of people jaded at the status quo as socialist/ism?
That's really what it boils down to.