d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > 9th District Court Upholds Private Property Rights > Prageru Vs Youtube
Prev1345
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Mar 3 2020 04:55pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 3 2020 11:58am)
Obama gave us the slowest recovery in history by artificially stimulating the economy with QE and bank bailouts and zero interest rates and other purely monetary policy to prod it along without building real underlying goods, services and wealth.
Trump gave us actual-but-exaggerated growth by deregulating and waging a trade war. His boom has seen clear actual growth reflected in shipping indexes and supply lines and demand for workers

There's no scenario where Obama in 8 years didn't see a recovery from the Bush collapse, because he couldn't hold back such market forces. But that last year of flatlined growth followed by a massive explosion starting on election day is clearly due to Trump and the expectation of his economy, which has paid off now. Now that doesn't mean Trump's economic boom will last forever, and only a fool claims to always know where the market is going. The jury will be out on Trump until a few years after he leaves office, so I don't think we'll have a full picture of what he accomplished until 2026+



He deserves the credit for going after Bin Laden because as Carter shows, its a risky move that takes balls. Trump of course did it about a half dozen times with every other top Al Qaeda / ISIS / Quds Force leader
If we're looking at the totality of their foreign policy, then this is not even a close comparison. Obama was a grade A fuck-up, Trump sold his soul to the devil to keep winning at everything. Obama didn't deliver on any of his promises to really end wars or avoid new entanglements, his every intervention was a complete disaster and god knows he made the Arab Spring worse, blinked at Putin in Ukraine, and was personally responsible with his schizophrenic policy for making what should have been a minor suppression of rebels in Syria into one of the worst post-WW2 humanitarian disasters that sent destabilizing shock waves through europe. Trump's been shitting tiffany cufflinks by comparison
I feel like with how many threads we've had about the Obama foreign policy vs Trump foreign policy I'm just beating a dead horse here so I won't keep going



A good thing, at a high price, sold on a lie, forged in a process corrosive to democracy and disastrously mismanaged on rollout.
Having expanded coverage and insuring the high risk pool with pre-existing conditions is an important thing that needed to happen, but I can't imagine how they could have fucked up the path getting there any worse than they did. My premium and deductible spiked 70% in a single year even though Obama promised the mandate would make it pay for itself and if I liked my doctor I could keep him. And it was drummed up in the worst farce of a legislation process I think any major bill has ever done, hammered out in a smoke filled room while fraudulent hearings were held and then swept aside and a bajillion page document introduced and voted on instantly without anyone reading it. And then what happened? Insurers fled the markets as they collapsed and were operating at a loss, states had to run in and subsidize individual markets at hefty expense, the insurers were put into unfunded risk corridors and the damn Obamacare websites never worked.

If we could go back and do it again, would anyone actually want to take a path remotely resembling what Obama did?



What could Obama have done for blacks or the poor in America? Expanded Medicaid and other social benefits under his watch seem like plenty good.
Getting such generous access to healthcare with guaranteed benefits that they have now is probably the best thing he could have done for them, all things considered.
Its not like the big pushes for decriminalization and social justice and cop-hating so common on the far-left now are actually good for the blacks and poor in America. You put a bunch of criminals back on the street and have cops not show up to calls anymore and it isn't the rich white people getting shot when the homicide rates skyrocket. Which they are, at least around here


All this and still the most successful modern president.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Mar 3 2020 05:47pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 2 2020 09:55pm)
I identify as a sane person in a world of ideologues


Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Mar 3 2020 11:30pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 2 2020 07:24pm)
"Having positions" is part of the problem.
The problem when sincere and unbending ideological convictions are treated as something to be lauded rather than regarded as a mental disorder, especially when its coupled with the corrosive environment of extreme toxic partisanship

You know we've already had political compass maps of PARD in the past, right? I've still got an image of everyone's dot on the grid stuck in a folder somewhere


Everyone holds positions. The sum of those positions can often be described by a few words. That's what your ideology is. Your positions shouldn't be described by your ideology--you are correct. You should decide on a case-by-case basis for each position. But those positions as a whole often have a trend, which is what we're talking about.

What trend do your positions that you have independently arrived at follow?
Member
Posts: 50,915
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Mar 3 2020 11:57pm
Quote (Testiclese @ Mar 3 2020 11:30pm)
Everyone holds positions. The sum of those positions can often be described by a few words. That's what your ideology is. Your positions shouldn't be described by your ideology--you are correct. You should decide on a case-by-case basis for each position. But those positions as a whole often have a trend, which is what we're talking about.

What trend do your positions that you have independently arrived at follow?


When you think that your own personal ideological views should guide public policy and think the ideals you believe in are superior to the way other people want to run things, that's ideology. If you're deciding on a case-by-case basis with an open mind between competing visions based on opposing guiding principles and weigh the costs and benefits and go for what's best in that situation- that's pragmatism. Ideologues opposing pragmatists in politics is nothing new and has been part of every political landscape since enlightenment.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 4 2020 12:02am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 3 2020 11:57pm)
When you think that your own personal ideological views should guide public policy and think the ideals you believe in are superior to the way other people want to run things, that's ideology. If you're deciding on a case-by-case basis with an open mind between competing visions based on opposing guiding principles and weigh the costs and benefits and go for what's best in that situation- that's pragmatism. Ideologues opposing pragmatists in politics is nothing new and has been part of every political landscape since enlightenment.


That is not ideology

Ideology is the system of values you use to determine the principles that are important to you and which ones you apply to which situation.

Everybody uses ideology. Thats why even something like data analysis can never be objective even when done by a computer, because what metrics are important depend on ideology.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Mar 4 2020 12:04am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 9 2020 05:24pm
Looks like Tulsi Gabbard's case against Google got thrown out as well.
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Mar 9 2020 05:59pm
9th Circus strikes again
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1345
Add Reply New Topic New Poll