I’m a climate expert and Ghot is an easily fooled idiot.

Which it make it interesting to trace out where it was recently pooped out on the web:

https://www.newscats.org/?p=22827

https://www.newscats.org/?author=1

"criminal democrats" "anti-greta" woowhohoho

.............

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Dec 14 2019 05:19pm

I mean, I'm not claiming they are absolutely tolerant. However, there's very little doubt they are far more tolerant than other generations.



Nah, I just personally think you aren't honest with yourself. You're not willing to look honestly at ideas that contradict things you build your identity around. To some degree that's normal, there's plenty of Christians here who refuse to accept a couple facts that contradict the beliefs they were raised on, but you're unwilling to even look.

I find it hilarious that you think I'm angry though. I'm pretty much universally acknowledged by my friend group to be an incredibly unemotional person, and I've even been described on the forum as an insurance salesman when describing why I got married.

If you include atheism as a religion then your definition of religion would incorporate any personal belief. Don't believe in unicorns? Your religion is aunicornism. Believe in toasters? You are a toasterist.

Yeah, I googled the title of the paper and got a ton of articles in which easily fooled conservatives were claiming victory, and then a bunch of other articles where they were being laughed at for being so easily fooled. Apparently it also got uncritical acceptance from Fox, which is pretty embarrassing.

And sunspots are really dragons taking bites out of the sun. :/

ayup. little fella thor has raged pm’d me unsolicited about events in his small-time personal life. casts out to strangers looking for approval due to minimal emotional capability beyond anger and denying math.

Big yikes. Why these leftists always projecting

So is a high school moron and a congress woman who can't do basic math. You are in good company my leechy friend.

Already looked, already did my own research years ago. Stop falsely claiming that I don't look and won't look!

I didn't conclude that you're an angry person from one or two posts; I concluded that from looking at your posts over the past couple years, plus a few where you were responding to me.

You are almost as bad as Scaly/Vivienne/whateverhisnameisnow.

You may convince yourself that you looked, but you weren't actually looking. I know that because you don't understand very basic concepts, like why the theory was proposed, and you say that scientists ignore things that conflict with their theories. Next time you look perhaps try looking with an open mind instead of just looking to disprove.



Let me give you something to chew on. We know for a fact that our current models of the big bang theory are wrong. And we know because the best way to get funding and notoriety in science is to find evidence that overturns current theories. For that reason plenty of research is published every year that conflicts with our current theories, and it is done in hopes of building a better theory that explains more of the data.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 14 2019 06:59pm