tengo una cabeza.

Genghis Khan did really well eradicating a lot of the Muslim world during the Mongul invasions. It set them back 100s of years.

There needs to be another invasion/purge to destroy the middle east and Mecca.

do you actually think the first amendment only applies to literally speaking? you can't really believe this

So sign language isn't speech?



not only literal speaking, literal speaking in english. MODERN english at that, from a document written over 200 years ago by many bilingual men speaking old english, who won their independence alongside french soldiers with supply boxes with french labels.

LOL Jefferson spoke 4 languages.

https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/languages-jefferson-spoke-or-read

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 31 2019 08:31am

Well, I hope so. LOL

Well why don't you explain how it applies to public signs?

Remember, I'm not saying WHAT the signs say, should be prohbited, just what language they say it in. I guess I'll also need an explanation of how signs are protected by the first amendment, being as how they aren't people.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 31 2019 08:33am

do signs blip into existence. or are they made by people as a way to speak?

and dodge this again grandpa: sign language isnt speech?

What is your opinion on removing Arabic worldwide and not just in specific countries?

It should become a historical language similar to Sanskrit in my opinion.

Sign language is not signs. Did you have head damage as a child?


/e The 1st amendment only applies, barely, to WHAT the signs say. Not what language they say it in.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 31 2019 08:39am