d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy Retires
Prev13456717Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Jun 27 2018 02:42pm
Quote (excellence @ Jun 27 2018 12:41pm)


ROFL
Member
Posts: 105,121
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jun 27 2018 02:47pm
Quote (excellence @ Jun 27 2018 04:41pm)




It's amazing that someone like Trump, who 55% of the country think is a simpleton, could pull off all the things he has.

Trump is ridiculed day and night as being unfit, yet he's still winning.
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Jun 27 2018 02:47pm
Quote (excellence @ 27 Jun 2018 15:41)


A disturbingly important motivation for a lot of modern Conservative sentiment is inducing Liberal tears. I don't see this sentiment shared as commonly among older Conservatives, though. It's mainly younger Conservatives.

Title of the other active SCOTUS thread: Scotus Making Liberals Cry So Much
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jun 27 2018 02:51pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ 27 Jun 2018 16:47)
A disturbingly important motivation for a lot of modern Conservative sentiment is inducing Liberal tears. I don't see this sentiment shared as commonly among older Conservatives, though. It's mainly younger Conservatives.

Title of the other active SCOTUS thread: Scotus Making Liberals Cry So Much

an 81 year old retires and lefties scream ‘traitor’ at this person

pardon us for finding that funny cracking up
Member
Posts: 33,919
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jun 27 2018 02:52pm
Quote (balrog66 @ Jun 27 2018 04:30pm)
Instead of going to a clinic desperate women will go on drug benders, physically injure themselves or worse.


The widespread public acceptance of abortion has only made this more common
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Jun 27 2018 02:56pm
This was a big motivation for conservative votes and will continue to be something they are very happy about keeping them with trump

I don't have faith in the left when it comes to actually voting so although I think Trump had 8 years locked in on day two I think he's real safe now

Memers are getting what they love as are conservatives that may not like the wrapping but they love the gift

I hope he continues with serious picks and he probably will

watching the era of Trump is a helluva thing I don't know if a luckier human being has ever existed
Member
Posts: 33,919
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jun 27 2018 03:04pm
Quote (excellence @ Jun 27 2018 04:41pm)


I kind of want to celebrate by trolling and getting epic banned by /latestagecapitalism
Member
Posts: 105,121
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jun 27 2018 03:15pm




The "sound" the Trump-train makes...



Member
Posts: 50,701
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Jun 27 2018 03:18pm
I was out earlier and only had time to write 'topic'
but I want to bask in the feeling of sweet vindication as I remind y'all what I was harping on about, at great length and many walls of text, a year and a half ago.

When Trump won and nominated Gorsuch, I was shrieking to anyone who would listen that the democrats were experiencing a self-destructive tea-party-esque radicalism that would cost them politically down the line in substantial ways. They insisted on pointlessly filibustering gorsuch to show how much they opposed him and make sure that the #NotMyPresident crowd didn't come for them like it has just done for a certain new york representative yesterday. The democrats were fearful of their radicalized far-left that was so vehemently anti-Trump that they were willing to force a nuclear showdown on the filibuster. They could have simply let it pass and keep the filibuster option intact, but no, they filibustered and McConnell immediately went nuclear and ended SCOTUS filibusters for good.

And as I predicted, the conditions in the senate changed substantially from when Trump took office. At the time the senators rallied around him with a spike in approval ratings and an election mandate. Even McCain who had a fit with the Gang of 14 was willing to go nuclear when it counted. But now the senate has narrowed to 51-49 and McCain is on his deathbed and openly rebuking Trump if not fully defecting to the democrats yet, and Jeff Flake is probably the least loved man in America. Maybe Murkowski got bought off with considerations for her state, but all it would take is two senators who were normally willing to vote for judicial nominees, but not willing to go nuclear for Trump now- but already went nuclear for him a year and a half ago.

The democrats threw away an important political fight. If we had a nuclear showdown today and either McCain croaks or lives long enough to spite Trump and even one defector is opposed to going nuclear, that would have positioned the democrats in a place to bargain. They would have been able to hold up the replacement and only resolve the showdown with at least some form of compromise even if it was mostly one-sided. They could have extracted a more moderate candidate or some other concessions somewhere. No. Instead, they postured with a pointless filibuster that served only to appease their radicals and now even a heavily dysfunctional senate majority led by McConnell is free to nominate count dracula to the supreme court.
Member
Posts: 105,121
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jun 27 2018 03:20pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 27 2018 05:18pm)
I was out earlier and only had time to write 'topic'
but I want to bask in the feeling of sweet vindication as I remind y'all what I was harping on about, at great length and many walls of text, a year and a half ago.

When Trump won and nominated Gorsuch, I was shrieking to anyone who would listen that the democrats were experiencing a self-destructive tea-party-esque radicalism that would cost them politically down the line in substantial ways. They insisted on pointlessly filibustering gorsuch to show how much they opposed him and make sure that the #NotMyPresident crowd didn't come for them like it has just done for a certain new york representative yesterday. The democrats were fearful of their radicalized far-left that was so vehemently anti-Trump that they were willing to force a nuclear showdown on the filibuster. They could have simply let it pass and keep the filibuster option intact, but no, they filibustered and McConnell immediately went nuclear and ended SCOTUS filibusters for good.

And as I predicted, the conditions in the senate changed substantially from when Trump took office. At the time the senators rallied around him with a spike in approval ratings and an election mandate. Even McCain who had a fit with the Gang of 14 was willing to go nuclear when it counted. But now the senate has narrowed to 51-49 and McCain is on his deathbed and openly rebuking Trump if not fully defecting to the democrats yet, and Jeff Flake is probably the least loved man in America. Maybe Murkowski got bought off with considerations for her state, but all it would take is two senators who were normally willing to vote for judicial nominees, but not willing to go nuclear for Trump now- but already went nuclear for him a year and a half ago.

The democrats threw away an important political fight. If we had a nuclear showdown today and either McCain croaks or lives long enough to spite Trump and even one defector is opposed to going nuclear, that would have positioned the democrats in a place to bargain. They would have been able to hold up the replacement and only resolve the showdown with at least some form of compromise even if it was mostly one-sided. They could have extracted a more moderate candidate or some other concessions somewhere. No. Instead, they postured with a pointless filibuster that served only to appease their radicals and now even a heavily dysfunctional senate majority led by McConnell is free to nominate count dracula to the supreme court.




A conservative count dracula, that is.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13456717Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll