Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ Dec 12 2017 12:13pm)
Here's some more great news.
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/12/in_final-hour_order_court_rule.htmlAmazing how swiftly their supreme court was able to act in this case.
Hm, it's too bad a certain special committee went dark and it's own members had no idea what the person next to do them was doing or they might be able to investigate something like this. But it's probably not part of their purview since it doesn't involve non existent illegal immigrants.
From the article...
Quote
But he did state that though the state does not preserve the digital ballot images, it does maintain the original paper ballots.
"The records for federal elections are required by law to be preserved for 22 months after the election occurs," Merrill said.
But Duncan said that "the paper ballots aren't really what's counted" unless there is a statewide recount, which would be "cost-prohibitive" if the state were ever to undertake one.
Also from the article...
Quote
At 1:36 p.m. Monday, a Montgomery County Circuit Court judge issued an order directing Alabama election officials to preserve all digital ballot images created at polling places across the state today.
Montgomery County is a Jones county, aka democrat.
You can hack digital ballots, you can't hack paper ballots.
Seems like Jones' $4.1 million (which he just acquired like 2-3 days ago) is already attempting to purchase a Democratic victory, even though it seems like it's against the people of Alabama's wishes.
Also from the same article...
Quote
But Priscilla Duncan, attorney for four Alabama voters who sued the state last week in an attempt to force election officials to preserve the digital records, said Tuesday that their argument was "spurious" and misleading.
There's no way to know for sure...but FOUR voters? Seems to me like one of the two parties is getting desperate.