d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Daca Set To Be Phased Out > Adios!
Prev13456724Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 26,284
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 13,845.00
Sep 4 2017 10:45pm
Quote (Xandriia @ Sep 4 2017 08:17pm)
Things like this are what's making it easy to see that modern day "conservatives" are just racist garbage. You don't care what impact people make on a country if those people are a few shades darker than paste.

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/news/2017/08/28/437956/daca-recipients-economic-educational-gains-continue-grow/


https://i.imgur.com/1VxthvF.png

Also this


You spitting out that vitriol about all conservatives is more telling about the type person you are. You sound like a petulant, emotionally immature child.

Just so you know that "100% have no criminal record" is actually pure bullshit which makes me question the accuracy of the rest of his stats.
Member
Posts: 32,538
Joined: Dec 6 2007
Gold: 1,945.00
Sep 4 2017 11:32pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 4 2017 10:45pm)
You spitting out that vitriol about all conservatives is more telling about the type person you are. You sound like a petulant, emotionally immature child.

Just so you know that "100% have no criminal record" is actually pure bullshit which makes me question the accuracy of the rest of his stats.


Don't care, I haven't seen a single sensible conservative since I've visited PaRD. I call it like I see it.

Weird, you seem to be missing the stats that you've looked up in your post. Move along muppet.
Member
Posts: 52,302
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Sep 5 2017 12:08am
Quote (Xandriia @ 5 Sep 2017 05:17)
Things like this are what's making it easy to see that modern day "conservatives" are just racist garbage. You don't care what impact people make on a country if those people are a few shades darker than paste.

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/news/2017/08/28/437956/daca-recipients-economic-educational-gains-continue-grow/


https://i.imgur.com/1VxthvF.png



Also this


yes, those numbers show that it would not be helpful to deport all dreamers or DACA recipients. but a too broad immigration reform would retrospectively reward the criminal actions of their parents, i.e. the illegal border crossing. and it would incentivize future massive illegal immigration. illegal immigration whose impact on society is far less positive than that of the DACA recipients. and a too broad immigration reform would turn the political landscape on its head and, effectively, disenfranchise conservative voters for decades, if not forever. this is a huge NO-GO!

but those considerations are probably not what's driving people to oppose a naturalization of illegal immigrants, nah, it must be boneheaded racism. :rolleyes: :wallbash:

there is only one sensible way forward: stop illegal immigration, grant the dreamers without a criminal record a path to permanent residency permits. what to do with the illegal immigrants who werent kids when they came into the country, but have been law-abiding members of society since then, is up for discussion.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 5 2017 12:08am
Member
Posts: 4,287
Joined: Aug 19 2011
Gold: 1.00
Sep 5 2017 02:08am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 4 2017 11:08pm)
yes, those numbers show that it would not be helpful to deport all dreamers or DACA recipients. but a too broad immigration reform would retrospectively reward the criminal actions of their parents, i.e. the illegal border crossing. and it would incentivize future massive illegal immigration. illegal immigration whose impact on society is far less positive than that of the DACA recipients. and a too broad immigration reform would turn the political landscape on its head and, effectively, disenfranchise conservative voters for decades, if not forever. this is a huge NO-GO!

but those considerations are probably not what's driving people to oppose a naturalization of illegal immigrants, nah, it must be boneheaded racism. :rolleyes: :wallbash:

there is only one sensible way forward: stop illegal immigration, grant the dreamers without a criminal record a path to permanent residency permits. what to do with the illegal immigrants who werent kids when they came into the country, but have been law-abiding members of society since then, is up for discussion.


No, DACA does not influence future illegal immigration, it only applies to individuals who arrived before the year 2007 as children. In fact this has already been proven, since DACA was first passed illegal entries into the US have continued to decrease, and not increase.
Member
Posts: 52,302
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Sep 5 2017 02:41am
Quote (TCassa89 @ 5 Sep 2017 10:08)
No, DACA does not influence future illegal immigration, it only applies to individuals who arrived before the year 2007 as children. In fact this has already been proven, since DACA was first passed illegal entries into the US have continued to decrease, and not increase.


if DACA recipients were naturalized, this would create incentives for future illegal immigration. thats what i meant.
Member
Posts: 104,575
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 5 2017 02:52am
Quote (TCassa89 @ Sep 4 2017 09:28pm)
That is not accurate, illegal immigrants contribute billions to social security every year, and more then this, they are legally prohibited from receiving any of its benefits.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-01/study-undocumented-immigrants-pay-billions-in-taxes

The only expenses illegal immigrants have on the system are at the local level, emergency rooms and in some places public schools. If they were really a big financial drain, then sanctuary cities would be the first places advocating for their removal, but that is not what we are seeing.. quite the opposite in fact




This article is full of crap, or at best seriously misleading. It says there are 11 million illegal immigrants, and they pay $12 billion each year to state and local governments, NOT federal.
12 billion divided by 11 million is $1090.00 per year.
Not a lot when the math is done.

And then in the same article towards the bottom...


Quote
"In 2010, the average unlawful immigrant household received around $24,721 in government benefits and services while paying some $10,334 in taxes," a report from the right-leaning Heritage Foundation think tank said in 2013. "This [deficit's] cost had to be borne by U.S. taxpayers."

In other words, even though immigrants in the country illegally pay billions of dollars to the U.S. government in the form of taxes, some research still pegs them as a net drain on government resources. But while neither the Heritage Foundation's report nor the institute's latest taxation study are likely to completely clear up much debate around whether such immigrants are a boon or a burden to the U.S. economy, the institute's report makes it clear that local governments collect at least some revenues from them.



So we put the two together and we see the illegal immigrants pay only $1090 to state and local govts. and are a net drain on the Fed at just a bit over 50%.
Not so pretty when you do the math.




/e

Quote (Xandriia @ Sep 4 2017 11:17pm)
Things like this are what's making it easy to see that modern day "conservatives" are just racist garbage. You don't care what impact people make on a country if those people are a few shades darker than paste.

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/news/2017/08/28/437956/daca-recipients-economic-educational-gains-continue-grow/


https://i.imgur.com/1VxthvF.png



Also this




And this article is just ludicrous.
There are 800,000 DACA kids, and the whole article and all it's "facts" are based not on anything official, but on a "survey" of ONLY 3,063 of the 800,000.

Puleeeze. :/

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 5 2017 02:57am
Member
Posts: 52,302
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Sep 5 2017 02:58am
Quote (Ghot @ 5 Sep 2017 10:52)
This article is full of crap, or at best seriously misleading. It says there are 11 million illegal immigrants, and they pay $12 billion each year to state and local governments, NOT federal.
12 billion divided by 11 million is $1090.00 per year.
Not a lot when the math is done.

And then in the same article towards the bottom...





So we put the two together and we see the illegal immigrants pay only $1090 to state and local govts. and are a net drain on the Fed at just a bit over 50%.
Not so pretty when you do the math.


as I said: illegal immigration as a whole has a negative effect. but I can very well imagine the subclass of DACA recipients being a net gain fiscally and for the society. I think DACA recipients are, at the very least, neutral in the costs they create and the taxes they pay.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 5 2017 03:00am
Member
Posts: 104,575
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 5 2017 03:02am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 5 2017 04:58am)
as I said: illegal immigration as a whole has a negative effect. but I can very well imagine the subclass of DACA recipients being a net gain fiscally and for the society. I think DACA recipients are, at the very least, neutral in the costs they create and the taxes they pay.




All the facts from the DACA article are crap, so even that may be suspect. A survey of 3,063 out of 800,000, is not very....telling.


/e I'd like to see some more "serious" research done about this. Which IMO does NOT mean a survey.
I do feel for these folks, but I'd still like to see some more authoritative research on the impact. Including whether they will allowed to legally bring in relatives.
Yes, they were educated in America, but their parents are the ones who probably had the most influence.

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 5 2017 03:06am
Member
Posts: 52,302
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Sep 5 2017 03:10am
Quote (Ghot @ 5 Sep 2017 11:02)
All the facts from the DACA article are crap, so even that may be suspect. A survey of 3,063 out of 800,000, is not very....telling.


/e I'd like to see some more "serious" research done about this. Which IMO does NOT mean a survey.
I do feel for these folks, but I'd still like to see some more authoritative research on the impact. Including whether they will allowed to legally bring in relatives.
Yes, they were educated in America, but their parents are the ones who probably had the most influence.

well, polling unregistered persons is inherently difficult.

about bringing in relatives: if trump gets his way with changing the priorities of the legal immigration system from "family reunion" to "qualified and sought after by our companies", then this wont be an issue. if the relatives of dreamers are qualified enough and can find a decent paying job for which no american can be found, then they are welcome. if they cant, which I assume will apply to most of them, the door remains shut.
Member
Posts: 104,575
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 5 2017 03:38am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 5 2017 05:10am)
well, polling unregistered persons is inherently difficult.

about bringing in relatives: if trump gets his way with changing the priorities of the legal immigration system from "family reunion" to "qualified and sought after by our companies", then this wont be an issue. if the relatives of dreamers are qualified enough and can find a decent paying job for which no american can be found, then they are welcome. if they cant, which I assume will apply to most of them, the door remains shut.




I seriously doubt there's a job for which an American "can't be found". There are 310 million legal Americans in this country.
I'm pretty sure, every job out there can be filled, even the undesired ones, by an American.

For me, it's not about race, it's about people born in this country, if qualified, should have first choice in the job market.
They should also have equal or better privileges in things like loans, education, etc.
Sometimes I just get tired of seeing American born citizens at the back of some line that's handing out things, just because they don't fit some arbitrary profile.

If the people in the US want to help other countries, fine...do it on THEIR soil...just don't do it in the US.
I dunno, do something like make the Peace Corps a paid job instead of strictly volunteer work, and sympathetic folks in the US, who can't afford to do volunteer work, may just decide to go help struggling countries, on that country's soil instead of ours.

We can't just keep absorbing people forever, We won't be able to support them and still give Americans the breaks that some of them need.


/e We definitely have problems right here at home. It's becoming impossible to devote the time and resources to solving these problems, if we are always using them to solve other countries problems.

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 5 2017 03:42am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13456724Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll