huh? yes, you did, post #34.


i had said


and you quoted that and said



so i asked what in what i said that you quoted opposed what jesus taught. i think i just got it, though, you werent actually referencing anything in my quote, you just meant that an eye for an eye contradicts what jesus taught. the answer to that is that jesus did have some idealogical differences, such as that, but eye for an eye is not a commandment per se. jesus still never said not to follow the commandments.

wait, are you or are you not arguing that jesus created satan and existed because the bible says so? if so, thats circular logic, which is no proof at all...




do you even lift ... up a finger and click to watch?

ah, so i did, my appologies.

"but he was a religious jew and never himself told his followers to be anything other than that."

Exodus 21:24-25

24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.

Mathew 5:38-39

38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth. 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.

the ten commandments in so many words are repeated through out the new testament, and for the most part the new testament is fair game.

This post was edited by Ylem122 on Oct 1 2013 02:02pm

ill give you that he bent things a bit, but he never came out and said explicitly not to follow the commandments, but did say many times that you should. also, eye for an eye is more of a concept than an actual commandment.

this also applies to what icemage referenced in matthew 15 and mark 7, where jesus says that its not what goes into the mouth that defiles, but rather what comes out of it. jesus never says, though, that its ok to eat sehllfish and pork. mark (or paul) assumes that from what he said. if you look at the context, though, and keep in mind that jesus repeatedly spoke out against hypocrisy of making a show of doing things without true belief behind it, it becomes clear that thats really all he is doing here. indeed, he even says this sentiment explicitly:

"6He replied, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written:

“ ‘These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
7They worship me in vain;
their teachings are merely human rules.’b
8You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”"

The Hell & ty God Jesus was a so awesome beaker and fisherman, sharing the stuff and taking care of others instead of arguing on the Book like no tomorrow

orly?

false.




jesus was a beaker? what size? 500 ml? 1000 ml?

The Hell & ty God Jesus was a so awesome baker and fisherman, sharing the stuff and taking care of others instead of arguing on the Book like a retard

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Oct 2 2013 05:57pm

wow, lighten up, it was a joke. sheesh...


jesus would not approve of your post, either.

eye for an eye is an aspect of judasim, it is not an aspect of christianity. Christianity is not judaisim, it is refined, and pacafist. it is not a set of laws, but a way to approach things.


there are people that do some very un christian things and call them self christians, that is not what im talking about. if you want to say that a large portion of christians dont follow chirists teachings, thats fine, but you seem to claim christianity = judeaisim, that is wrong, they are diffrent teachiings.

Do on to otheres as you would have them do to you vs do onto others as they have done onto you.

This post was edited by Ylem122 on Oct 2 2013 09:44pm