Quote (bentherdonethat @ 15 Jan 2011 01:56)
Yes, because after taking a walk in a crowded and polluted city, the first thing I want to do when I go indoors is breathe in some more polluted air. That's like saying "Well 3000 calories a day will probably make you fat if you're not physically active anyway, so another 3000 calories a day on top of that aren't that bad."
backwards logic obv
enviormental polution is bad enough, cigarette smoke is just adding to carsinogenicity and our total load. There is only so much we can detox from
Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ 15 Jan 2011 02:56)
I'm waiting for the anti-smokers to start crying about second hand smoke from the vapor from electronic cigarettes.
I knew a few organizations are trying to get them banned in bars and clubs here in maryland.
Their arguement is that is encourges others to light up. Haha.
so far as i know there hasnt been any safety testing for electronic cigarettes.
But i would agree with u that its obvious that those are going to be less harmful than normal cigarettes, absolutly no doubt about that. But that doesnt mean they should be treated differently than non-electronic cigarettes and they should not be exempt from the same safety standards as non-electronic
This post was edited by Toothfariy on Jan 15 2011 03:01am