Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 27 2024 06:45pm)
Man, this is a difficult question. Definitely not Lincoln. Not a fan of Tyrants. I think Nixon was hilarious, but his acceptance of Henry Kissinger's plan to bring Communist China into the fold, modernize them, as a weapon against Russia has led us to the mass outsourcing of today, so not really a fan there either. Raegan failed to resign from office when his brain went tits up, and his crazy wife ruled in all but name nearly tyrant style as well.
Maybe Coolidge? I don't know. It's just hard to say. Obama was shit and his active attempt to socialize our healthcare has skyrocketed healthcare costs for the working age, and far from minimalizing outsourcing as he claimed, he instead provided further tax incentives and amplified it. Trump was decent enough, but he was too busy playing by the rules Democrats claimed he had to play by, when they don't play by those rules themselves, to get a lot done. Bush was a warmongering globalist cuck and can fuck right off. GHWB was better than his son, and honestly was decent, but "greatest"? Nah. Clinton's primary claim to fame was not debt spending, but that was due more to Gingrich cockblocking him.
I dunno. Most presidents are terrible, and most of their actions hurt Americans far more than they help. Perhaps the best answer is this:
lolwut. are you pro slavery now?