Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Feb 12 2024 04:35pm)

How is a trans person more likely to be a shooter?

Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 12 2024 10:41pm)

By being either a casual factor or parallel symptom of mental illness that manifests into violent anti-social behaviors
Pretty small leap from the hairy dude screaming in the face of a polite cashier demanding to be called ma'am, to a mass shooter

Its a pretty simple and explicable relationship, and its not particularly relevant to what degree gender bending causes basket cases versus being a manifestation of their insanity versus being a trendy psychosomatic condition adopted by a fringe, because in all scenarios its still a clear warning sign and indicator.

Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 12 2024 10:31pm)

Mind you the definitions are completely arbitrary and the data points are often invalid. For example, that timeline only includes attacks that killed at least 3 people even if there were many more attempted and failed attacks, like the one in the OP here. And even among the restrictive definition, we've got the colorado springs shooter who identifies as transgender and uses they/them pronouns (5 killed), the christian school shooter who was transgender targeting cis kids (6 killed), the aberdeen shooter who was black and trans (4 killed). That's not including the transgender STEM shooter who targeted cis kids, since that was only 1 killed, which excludes it from this arbitrary definition but would be included in anyone's rational list of "what americans consider a terrorist attack / mass shooting" since its a kid walking into a school and trying to mass murder people with a rifle

That timeline's summary includes 3 of those incidents but only lists 1 transgender shooter in 151 incidents. So its actually 3/151, which would be nearly 2% of all shooters, despite covering a 40 year range when trans nonsense didn't even exist, and still only makes up what, 0.6% of the population in very liberal estimates

I imagine any other statistical analysis is going to be similarly flawed, either they're using obviously invalid data or silly definitions



better yet, don't make statistical arguments in the first place
I mean, who decides what the 'unpadded statistics' are? Who decides whether to quantify the colorado springs shooter as cis or transgender, when he self-identifies as transgender but in a delicious fit of irony the trannies want to deny his gender identity and label him cis

Quote (Handcuffs @ 12 Feb 2024 23:06)

How is it a "propaganda talking point" if it's true though?

Quote (Handcuffs @ 12 Feb 2024 23:38)

The disparity between the number of children victimized by transgender perpetrators and those in some kind of religious institution is vast.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ Feb 12 2024 03:14pm)

The gist of this talking point was that transgender people are totally innocent and harmless, that the political right is negative on them for no reason other than their own bigotry and that all the negative attributes and behaviors (child abuse, propensity for mass shootings etc.) is actually just projection by the evil right-wingers.

Lo and behold, there is a prominent case of transgender people living up to their negative characterization on a nearly weekly basis.

Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Feb 12 2024 05:51pm)

Lucky the UK has restricted access to guns or a whole lotta mass shooting would've taken place here.

Quote (Sioux @ 12 Feb 2024 17:16)

Shocked pard would fall for yet another hoax about a shooter being transgender.