the same city he sexually assaulted her in?
if you want to bitch about the jury, maybe dont rape people in cities you dont want to go to court in? seems pretty basic

What 'conspiracy' is required?
Are you so enamored of the jury system you actually think juries always believe their own verdicts?
When a jury of Bryant and Milam's peers found them not guilty of lynching Emmett Till, it wasn't a conspiracy, it was a raging bias.

You don't believe it happened, and neither do they. Neither of you need a reason to let that obstruct your hatred of Donald Trump

just because I and others dont like him doesnt absolve Trump from raping people. you dont get a get-out-of-jail-free card just because you are anathema

The conspiracy is the jurors acting together to a verdict despite not believing it. Juries can make mistakes or nullify but this case was pretty open and shut. Of course you aren't capable of acknowledging when the system works though, you're working backwards from Trump being right.

It's also just incredibly dumb to believe that a city has a monolithic hatred. Jury selection is a thing and trumps lawyers were more than capable of finding biased jurors and exempting them.

Even I, a wannabe pundit couch warrior from a different continent, know that the defense can only reject a very limited number of prospective jurors.
https://nysba.org/NYSBA/Coursebooks/Fall%202013%20CLE%20Coursebooks/Basics%20of%20Civil%20Practice%20The%20Trial%202013/1_Jury_Section.pdf



So the whole lynchpin of your argument, namely the assumption that Trump was found guilty by a fair and unbiased jury, falls apart.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 27 2024 01:38pm

It's really weird how Trump cultists(bogie, goom, etc) react to these situations.

Let's be real, it's suspect whether or not Trump is guilty of sexually assaulting that woman. But it's even more weird how Trump cultists insist on defending the guy, even up to him being the presidential nominee. How is that rational? It's a suicide pact because you all agree on the people you hate.

If you can show bias in the juror you don't use one of your challenges

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jan 27 2024 01:45pm

If you can prove bias. In most cases, there will be strong indications that a juror is probably biased one way or the other, but no sufficient proof.

Say you have a 24 year old black woman who is a street worker spending her days trying to help underprivileged kids. Going by demographic trends from exit poll data, there's a 99% chance that she voted against Trump both times he was on the ballot, and maybe an 80% chance that she hates him with a passion - but unless the defense finds explicit comments on Trump on her social media or something like that, they cannot prove that she actually is biased against him.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 27 2024 01:46pm