Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Jan 22 2024 11:59am)
A wall is largely only symbolic. The border is 1900 miles? Any solution that involves actively patrolling 1900 miles of terrain is a losing strategy and at best a sticking plaster.
Addressing the systemic causes of mass migration is the only worthwhile strategy. That being said its difficult to deter people from wanting a better life and the comparative opportunity of the United States and for example Venezuela are never going to be comparable.
An actual deterrent would be required and perhaps an advance or application of existing technology to police the border.
The systemic cause of migration is economic poverty and political instability. Those are incredibly difficult challenges to address even when you're in complete control of a place (see Iraq), the notion that we're going to solve Mexican / Central American gang violence and endemic poverty by starting a few aid programs and signing a few cheques is complete nonsense. The scale of the undertaking would be the occupation of Northern Mexico and the summary execution of gang members (i.e. anyone with a tattoo). That's unlikely for some pretty obvious reasons.
The problem with enforcement today is that they're being released directly into the United States. Remain in Mexico was effective precisely because it denied economic migrants the opportunity to slip into the United States, where they can skip their court dates and rely on Biden admin "guidance" to ICE to avoid deportation.
Hire more men, build a bigger wall, dig deeper ditches. If you need to spend $50 billion to solve a problem that goes back decades, do it.