Quote (bogie160 @ Jan 5 2024 04:47pm)
Fairness is reward according to merit. Where the merit comes from, whether hard work, genetic gift, socialization, parenting, or some combination of them all is neither here nor there. Something is being provided, and something commensurate is being given in return. Through that merit is properly rewarded and incentivized, and the broader group is better off.
this is being goal oriented based on rewards/consequences
I'm advocating for being process oriented
if you are dedicated to the goal, then you will justify corruption to meet an ends
if you are dedicated to the process, then you will not need to justify corruption to meet an ends
talent and the capacity for determined effort, depend a great deal on one’s genetic endowments and upbringing (all luck, therefore meritocracy is flawed)
a belief in meritocracy is not only demonstrably false, a growing body of research in psychology and neuroscience suggests that believing in meritocracy makes people more selfish, less self-critical and even more prone to acting in discriminatory ways
have you ever gone to a dealership to buy a car? you need not look any further for concrete evidence of the deception people are willing to put you through to achieve their own agenda
I've studied game theory extensively and there are many experiments that prove people who believe they are more talented (even if they truly aren't) will act more selfishly and unethically
Meritocracy is a false and not very salutary belief. As with any ideology, part of its draw is that it justifies the status quo, explaining why people belong where they happen to be in the social order. It is a well-established psychological principle that people prefer to believe that the world is just, when all it really does is try to justify the ends of luck being harnessed to trample on the less fortunate