d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Durham Exonerates Clinton Campaign
Prev1345678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 31,907
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,873.50
May 16 2023 05:29pm
Quote (Landmine @ May 16 2023 07:22pm)
It’s a report about trump. Democrats I swear are some of the dumbest people to ever walk this planet. Fing 🦃


Durham tried to prove a Democratic plot to frame Trump. He couldn’t.

The report isn't about donny, keep stretching your tds to fit your needs.
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
May 16 2023 05:34pm
Quote (said_aouita @ May 16 2023 05:29pm)
Durham tried to prove a Democratic plot to frame Trump. He couldn’t.

The report isn't about donny, keep stretching your tds to fit your needs.


Yeah he did prove it. That’s why cnn is saying this exonerates trump. Good god… you’re at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to 🦃
Member
Posts: 31,907
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,873.50
May 16 2023 06:12pm
Quote (Landmine @ May 16 2023 07:34pm)
Yeah he did prove it. That’s why cnn is saying this exonerates trump. Good god… you’re at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to 🦃


The investigation was launched in May 2019 by Trump's former Attorney General William Barr -- a probe that Trump and his right-wing allies repeatedly predicted would "investigate the investigators" and lead to bombshell indictments of those who scrutinized the former president. Four years later, Durham's investigation yielded one minor conviction, two losses at trial and a probe that fell short of the lofty goals set by the former president.

Durham only secured one conviction: the guilty plea of a low-level FBI lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, who avoided jail after admitting to doctoring an email about a surveillance warrant. Durham's other two prosecutions -- against a Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer and the primary source for the Trump-Russia dossier -- ended with embarrassing acquittals.


Hope this helps.
Member
Posts: 105,130
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
May 16 2023 07:51pm




Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 16 2023 07:57pm
Quote (said_aouita @ May 16 2023 07:12pm)
The investigation was launched in May 2019 by Trump's former Attorney General William Barr -- a probe that Trump and his right-wing allies repeatedly predicted would "investigate the investigators" and lead to bombshell indictments of those who scrutinized the former president. Four years later, Durham's investigation yielded one minor conviction, two losses at trial and a probe that fell short of the lofty goals set by the former president.

Durham only secured one conviction: the guilty plea of a low-level FBI lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, who avoided jail after admitting to doctoring an email about a surveillance warrant. Durham's other two prosecutions -- against a Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer and the primary source for the Trump-Russia dossier -- ended with embarrassing acquittals.


Hope this helps.



So did the Clinton campaign get their $113,000 back?
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
May 16 2023 10:35pm
Quote (YeeHaw @ May 16 2023 12:00pm)
I am sorry do you not receive notifications for this stupid topic you created?

Next time you post a report, read the fucking report, loser.


How do you survive in the world? Like truly Ethan, I want to know.
Member
Posts: 2,289
Joined: Jul 19 2009
Gold: 11,157.55
May 16 2023 10:39pm
Quote (Sioux @ May 17 2023 12:35am)
.


Did trump collude with russia in the 2016 election?
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
May 16 2023 10:54pm
Quote (EaterOfSound @ May 16 2023 09:39pm)
Did trump collude with russia in the 2016 election?


No, Mueller was unable to reach a conclusion. Whether he did and successfully obstructed the investigation, or didn't and obstructed for some weird reason I couldn't tell you. Between those two options I can tell you which one makes more sense though.
Member
Posts: 2,289
Joined: Jul 19 2009
Gold: 11,157.55
May 16 2023 10:58pm
Quote (Sioux @ May 17 2023 12:54am)
No, Mueller was unable to reach a conclusion. Whether he did and successfully obstructed the investigation, or didn't and obstructed for some weird reason I couldn't tell you. Between those two options I can tell you which one makes more sense though.


So there is no proof that he did and a three year investigation was not able to conclude that he did.

For sake of argument, lets momentarily the remove burden of proof. Is there any evidence whatsoever that he did in fact collude with russia during the 2016 election?

This post was edited by EaterOfSound on May 16 2023 10:58pm
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
May 16 2023 11:05pm
Quote (EaterOfSound @ May 16 2023 09:58pm)
So there is no proof that he did and a three year investigation was not able to conclude that he did.

For sake of argument, lets momentarily the remove burden of proof. Is there any evidence whatsoever that he did in fact collude with russia during the 2016 election?


I mean if you ignore the numerous and sustained contacts his team had with Russian intelligence assets, then no there's no proof. There could be tape of Trump sucking Putin off and thanking him for his help in 2016 and it wouldn't convince the cult at this point.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1345678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll