Thoughts?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/

Showing both with a very strong bias toward their respective side, and fox marginally more biased than cnn, but generally in the same ballpark.

I already posted them earlier but I'll say them again. She was absolutely wrong to say that and people in power should be more careful when calling out individuals. You have a lot more flexibility when you call out institutions i.e. a police department. Calling out individuals should have the highest scrutiny.

OAN and National Review in the same slot. Buzzfeed News, Vox and NYT opinion in with Jacobin and Democracy Now?

This is a list for people who've never read 80% of the outlets present.

I subscribe to WSJ, NYT, WaPo, and The Atlantic. I follow many perspectives on Twitter(everyone except Trump cultists and truly radical progressives).

The list is silly. There should be another axis measuring the seriousness of the outlet. In that case, maybe National Review and OAN could be in the same column. The Dispatch would be at the top of their sorry competitors.

This post was edited by IceMage on Aug 27 2020 05:43pm

It's twitter. It's a cesspool of far-leftists who think anything done outside their ideological dogma must've been done by a white supremacist. I pay no attention to their "opinions".

a young swamp demon appears



shut up karen

The list is according to their algo and is reinforced by tens of thousands of community reviewers essentially saying yay or nay on their assement.

Is it perfect? Probably not, but for sure beats your warped perception that cnn isn’t biased.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Aug 27 2020 05:44pm

National Review is significantly more serious. You can actually get some intelligent right-wing analysis from there. I'm fine with very biased sources such as Mother Jones and National Review because often times it's a values thing. As long as you're factual and open about your bias, I think that's fine.

It's clearly measuring ideological slant.

The list largely confirms to what I'd expect. Perhaps you simply need to expose yourself to a wider range of media.

How far left or right you are is not necessarily how biased you are, and the left/right spectrum is unsatisfactory to begin with.

CNN is extremely biased in favor of swampy establishment democrats and the general left and against Trump, but isn't necessarily the frontrunner for biggest Stalin/Marx water carrier(aka not the furthest left).

The link OTV posted is a pretty solid guideline for identifying bias within those limited parameters.



yeah agree to disagree is fine. not everyone gets or appreciates all dark or edgy humor, but i thought it was interesting enough to post.


Very true.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 27 2020 06:01pm