for anyone confused here's how the logic follows.
1) screwy at best evidence it could be done, in theory
2) misleading evidence on what the votes should have equaled with metrics selectively chosen like registration data, etc
so then the "overwhelming part" is 1 + 2 = 5. "we think it could be done based on these witnesses, and we think this is how the totals should have come out, so this MUST BE our smoking gun"
there is almost no evidence even presented of witnesses claiming they saw machines hacked, just that it could they believe happen, and as the result is for Biden, it therefor must have.
pure, salty, unadulterated, unabridged, election denial.