The thing I like about that option is, the tax money stays local in these cases, since property taxes go to either the municipality, or to the county. It doesn't have to go to the state first to then be handed back out.

ive got all of that except the pool on my cheap dirt patch

it kinda amazes me that we get the freedom to say no take this amount vs that amount up front. i think if they didnt auto-deduct taxes and everyone had to write a check each quarter we’d demand more accountability in govt at all levels


yeah I don’t disagree. the further away tax dollars go from the source the higher chance of waste and underutilization. best to keep it as local as possible like you said

This post was edited by excellence on May 20 2020 09:37am

You’ll don’t wanna see Jersey property taxes.

As this is the only portion of your post that's in any way factual or relevant, it's all I'll address:

1. Bullshit "investigations" by Obama-era officials in an attempt to discredit Trump or any of his supporters do not interest me. We've had 3.5 years of that shit, and it all comes to nothing more than a bunch of wasted time and money. If all that's required to "prevent" a duly elected President from having the staff they choose is to "claim investigation" then let's just go ahead and stop pretending that the executive branch is led by the President in any way, shape, or form, yes?

2. Of course Trump is wealthy and privileged. Who said he wasn't? Who even hinted he wasn't? Under his administration, Federal land grabs, federal taxes among all but the wealthiest, federal interference in state issues have all been minimized. These are things that benefit the underclass.

3. There's a difference between "shilling" and calling out the bullshit of Never-Trumpers like you. You keep making claims that are senseless and false and expecting everyone to believe them. Sorry, I have no interest in participating in your fairy tale land. When Trump does or says something stupid, I call him on it. But not here in PaRD. Why? There's always a dogpile of people like you jumping on it. I don't need confirmation bias, nor do I need to provide it.

The moment I see you acknowledge one positive thing about Trump's administration I'm gonna Shart. You appear to exist in a bubble of absolutes, and quite frankly, the kind of intellectual laziness required to accomplish that is rather extreme.

Obama Removed Eric Holder because he Was about to go to jail.

That may be, but Holder was AG and not an IG.

Obama removed his wing man Holder to protect him. JFK made his own brother AG in a display of consolidation of power since he knew what forces he’d be facing off against

But Trump dimissing a holdover from the prior admin is the issue of all the times lmao

completely random timing of course, what's the big deal, right?

So an OpEd that says stuff that has no backing in evidence whatsoever is your go-to?

But let's say it's true: Would the State department selling weapons to another nation be a waste, misuse, or fraudulent use of State Department resources? Short answer: No. If the state department profits off the deal, foreign policy is achieved, and if the arms are not being sold to enemies of the United States, there's nothing there. But it's all immaterial. Tweets that attempt to cite OpEds as reliable sources tend to go nowhere.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on May 20 2020 03:01pm