Quote (bogie160 @ Aug 27 2020 03:47pm)
I would like to see it, because these things are often hard to quantify.
For a number of reasons I've watched a great deal of CNN, and very little Fox, so I won't try to compare the two. What I would say is that CNN is very selective in what they cover. Violence didn't fit the narrative, so they pretended it didn't exist until the gig was up and it was impossible to ignore. And while I'd agree that historically CNN has had a somewhat better track record on reporting, their bias has become considerably worse since the Trump administration took office.
I don't think any news network could survive a Trump presidency without appearing to become more biased. There's simply an endless stream of incompetency, corruption, and bullshit coming out of the White House, so almost any day of coverage can be filled with negative stories. Most crises are just amplified by Trump, which in turn amps up his opponents. Also you have anchors, journalists, and pundits who have followed his behavior all day, every single day. So there's a built up level of knowledge and frustration that seeps through the coverage.
So for people who don't follow the news closely, CNN appears to be pretty damn biased against the president. They are biased against him. But it's mostly because reality is biased against Trump.
If he wins re-election, it won't be because voters affirmed him. It'll be because they didn't pay attention during his presidency.