Or... Its expected.

Since every week people die, and some portion of those voted by mail

If you think that number is too high then calculate the expected number due to random chance and compare

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Aug 17 2020 08:47am

LOL. Damn straight.

Out with it, I'm not putting words in your mouth.

The news story you're referring to is obviously a crock.
The odds of 846 people conveniently dying in that short a time frame is astronomical.


/e Whereas the odds that someone messed with the ballots and either bought off or pulled the wool over some reporters eyes, are very low.

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 17 2020 09:20am

Both sides do it, but it's not a widespread problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLpeX4RRo28

Honestly... how would you know, that it's not widespread?

How do you know it is ?

- The ones who are pushing for -less- money [to securize, even generalize] voting are your Republicans politicians.
- The problem is global and is also happening in your regular "voting stations": it's still super small, almost negligible.

The real threat for voting is vote suppresion and sabotage/blatant negligence. Underfunding.

Exemple: If Trump take more than 5% in the ass the ~~0.01% of fraudulent votes (which will be shared by both side btw) will change nothing.

https://www.mdch.state.mi.us/osr/Provisional/MontlyDxCounts.asp

Generally speaking, 8-13,000 people die every month in Michigan.



So early voting for the general election roughly 6 weeks, even if early voting for the primary is only 2 weeks, ~4500 people die in that span. To state that 20% of them are voters is not a stretch in the slightest. Your definition of astronomical is wanting.

This post was edited by Santara on Aug 17 2020 10:50am