d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Georgia Lynching > Wtf, America?
Prev1383940414245Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,157
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
May 20 2020 08:52am
Quote (Goomshill @ May 20 2020 09:44am)
Self-defense still isn't punishment, and that hasn't changed in 39 pages


Devil is in the details. The self-defense isn't punishment argument seems pretty weak to me, but there are a ton of missing details. What McMichaels were doing is a-kin to what a cry bully does on the playground.

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on May 20 2020 08:53am
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 20 2020 08:54am
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 20 2020 09:52am)
It becomes harder to claim self defense when you initiate the conflict.


morally yes. legally probably no. Georgia is a long gun open carry state, which means walking up to someone with a gun drawn isn't an escalation of force leaving you at fault for a conflict that follows.

there's a reason open carry states and states with a big racism history have such a large crossover.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 20 2020 08:55am
Quote (thesnipa @ 20 May 2020 16:46)
on one hand i like that "he was just a sweet angel" narratives are countered, because we always get the same story. "wouldn't hurt a fly", "all his teachers loved him", 5 year old sophomore year high school pic dressed in sunday best, etc.

but on the other hand in a court of law past lawbreaking isn't admissible evidence, for just this very reason, it influences otherwise impartial people.

i dont think the police should spearhead the videos being released, but if a media outlet can report false "he was a sweet boy" quotes they can and should release videos that show additional context. or reports a person was suspended for fighting in school, or what they usually look like rather than sunday best, etc.


if those 'he was a sweet boy' stories trigger you so much, you should ask yourself why people tell them - because racist scum acts like if they could prove he committed a crime in the past, then the murder is somehow justified.

it's funny how you try so hard to appear 'balanced', but always end up giving your bias away by not managing to think more than just one layer deep.
Member
Posts: 50,915
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
May 20 2020 08:55am
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 20 2020 09:52am)
It becomes harder to claim self defense when you initiate the conflict.


No, its still clearly self defense, just unjustifiable. So its a question of whether it can be justified or not. Not whether its a punishment.
You don't punish someone by getting your head bashed in by them and grappling with them in a fight to the death over a gun.
Not all forms of criminal violations of one person against another are a form of extrajudicial punishment. Was Ahmaud Arbery 'punishing' the people he was stealing from in the past?
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 20 2020 09:16am
Quote (Goomshill @ May 20 2020 10:44am)
Self-defense still isn't punishment, and that hasn't changed in 39 pages


Yes, Arbrey was killed defending himself from his killers. Nobody is saying self-defense is wrong except supporters of the McMichaels in this instance.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 20 2020 09:18am
Quote (thesnipa @ May 20 2020 10:54am)
morally yes. legally probably no. Georgia is a long gun open carry state, which means walking up to someone with a gun drawn isn't an escalation of force leaving you at fault for a conflict that follows.

there's a reason open carry states and states with a big racism history have such a large crossover.


Carry =/= brandishing

Show me the statute thst shows it is legal to point a shotgun at a stranger for no justified reason. I'll wait for it.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 20 2020 09:18am
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 20 2020 09:23am
Quote (Skinned @ May 20 2020 10:18am)
Carry =/= brandishing

Show me the statute thst shows it is legal to point a shotgun at a stranger for no justified reason?


i dont frankly see the point, if there's a law that excuses this killing legally i dont support it. ive already said that these fucks deserve to get raped on Cell block B for a few decades, that i dont support ANY vigilante justice unless imminent loss of life is in play (exceedingly rare), that these men did what they did for racist reasons, etc.

i've hardened the blade in the quench oil as hard as i can, early in the thread, but providing legal context and scrutiny about media behavior is just a bit of tempering. too hard of a blade will crack.

Georgia has open carry for long guns, Georgia is racist, Georgia has stand your ground laws.

A.) you're legally allowed to have a gun on you openly while confronting someone
B.) you're legally allowed to "stand your ground" if that person then makes any move towards you by pointing the gun at them
C.) you're legally allowed to shoot that person if they reach for the gun.

stand your ground laws + open carry are a bad combo. they allow for legally justified morally unjustified acts. i hope it doesnt go that way in court, but i think it will.


Context: my post 9 days ago, my opinion hasnt changed

Quote (thesnipa @ May 11 2020 09:31am)
given that we still know very little about the specifics it's none the less apparent that some wannabe do-gooders approached someone with guns out to try for a vigilante arrest.

Even if this guy turns out to be a burglar, kiddie diddler, and vegan pineapple cauliflower pizza chef they still approached someone with guns drawn to try and make a violent citizens arrest. charges for this alone are warranted. dont take the law into your own hands unless your safety is in danger. dont roam streets with guns, even if you're an ex cop or off duty cop.

that type of behavior should be criminal especially from right wingers who claim to be pro police and pro gun rights. they bypassed the police to put law abiding gun owners rights at risk. i think a minimum of a sentence of 1 year of brutal treatment from a largely black prison population should set them straight.



This post was edited by thesnipa on May 20 2020 09:27am
Member
Posts: 50,915
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
May 20 2020 09:26am
Quote (Skinned @ May 20 2020 10:16am)
Yes, Arbrey was killed defending himself from his killers. Nobody is saying self-defense is wrong except supporters of the McMichaels in this instance.


Are you saying that Arbery was trying to carry out extrajudicial punishment on the McMichaels for stalking him?

Quote (Skinned @ May 20 2020 10:18am)
Carry =/= brandishing

Show me the statute thst shows it is legal to point a shotgun at a stranger for no justified reason. I'll wait for it.


has there been any evidence so far that the carried guns were actually pointed at Arbery? I've seen so much politicized spam about the case the thin facts have been deeply buried so I don't actually know if someone has evidence of that or not. I'd assume that when they were behind the truck in the video and Arbery grabbed the gun and was shot through the hand- that it must not have been pointed at him, else it would have struck him in the body after passing through his hand.

also, Georgia has no actual brandishing law unlike many other states, leaving it entirely up to the very rough fit into 'aggravated assault'

This post was edited by Goomshill on May 20 2020 09:27am
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 20 2020 09:36am
Quote (thesnipa @ May 20 2020 11:23am)
i dont frankly see the point, if there's a law that excuses this killing legally i dont support it. ive already said that these fucks deserve to get raped on Cell block B for a few decades, that i dont support ANY vigilante justice unless imminent loss of life is in play (exceedingly rare), that these men did what they did for racist reasons, etc.

i've hardened the blade in the quench oil as hard as i can, early in the thread, but providing legal context and scrutiny about media behavior is just a bit of tempering. too hard of a blade will crack.

Georgia has open carry for long guns, Georgia is racist, Georgia has stand your ground laws.

A.) you're legally allowed to have a gun on you openly while confronting someone
B.) you're legally allowed to "stand your ground" if that person then makes any move towards you by pointing the gun at them
C.) you're legally allowed to shoot that person if they reach for the gun.

stand your ground laws + open carry are a bad combo. they allow for legally justified morally unjustified acts. i hope it doesnt go that way in court, but i think it will.


Context: my post 9 days ago, my opinion hasnt changed


Its too bad people don't know about jury nullification.

I suppose that could come down to whose peers are on the jury, McMichael's or Arbery's.

Generally it is the peers of the McMichael's deciding on the fate of McMichael's while Arbery's and his peers are corpses.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 20 2020 09:37am
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 20 2020 09:46am
Quote (Skinned @ May 20 2020 10:36am)
Its too bad people don't know about jury nullification.

I suppose that could come down to whose peers are on the jury, McMichael's or Arbery's.

Generally it is the peers of the McMichael's deciding on the fate of McMichael's while Arbery's and his peers are corpses.


You'll have the McMichael's defense lawyers striking down any black jurors in voir dire, and a sympathetic DA doing the same from the other end. or they'll just charge with murder 1 knowing the case cant be made.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1383940414245Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll