d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev1388389390391392983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 53,338
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 16 2020 09:46am
Quote (cambovenzi @ 16 May 2020 11:43)
Presenting facts and disagreeing with you is not tin foil hat conspiracy theories and white nationalism.

No integrity or intellect. You should feel ashamed.

how can someone of his national-socialist tendencies and lineage accuse anyone else of white nationalism lmfao

he literally tries the no u approach everytime and expects people not to laugh at the irony
Member
Posts: 20,761
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 6,061.70
May 16 2020 09:46am
Quote (fender @ May 16 2020 08:32am)
https://i.imgur.com/IXnhNKQ.jpg

despots gonna despot...



ah, our white nationalist apologist has gone full blown maga tin foil hat. was just a matter of time really...


That is a political appointment. Appointed by the POTUS. Not an "independent watchdog". He was appointed by Obama in 2013.

You don't even know wtf you're talking about.
Member
Posts: 53,338
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 16 2020 09:49am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 16 May 2020 11:46)
That is a political appointment. Appointed by the POTUS. Not an "independent watchdog". He was appointed by Obama in 2013.

You don't even know wtf you're talking about.

well yeah he (fender aka heinrich von goebbels aka descendant of joseph) is a foreign voyeur who denies the holocaust and that the national-socialists lost world war II. how can he even be informed about anything outside of his bubble when he gets basic historical facts all messed up
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 16 2020 09:51am
Quote (cambovenzi @ 16 May 2020 17:43)
Presenting facts and disagreeing with you is not tin foil hat conspiracy theories and white nationalism.


true. uncritically buying into 'phony investigation' narratives, and making excuses for white nationalists trying to spread racist propaganda, however, is.

that's why you never accurately describe what you actually posted, just rephrase it in vague terms to pretend it's just harmless and agreeable positions. the sad thing is that you seem to think that's clever, when really it's just disingenuous and transparently stupid, lol.

This post was edited by fender on May 16 2020 09:53am
Member
Posts: 20,761
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 6,061.70
May 16 2020 09:56am
Quote (fender @ May 16 2020 08:51am)
true. uncritically buying into 'phony investigation' narratives, and making excuses for white nationalists trying to spread racist propaganda, however, is.

that's why you have never accurately describe what you actually posted, just rephrase it in vague terms to pretend it's just harmless and agreeable positions. the sad thing is that you seem to think that's clever, when really it's just disingenuous and transparently stupid, lol.


Russia Investigation: Nope, no collusion.
Flynn Investigation: Nope, no wrongdoing, no crime, and the FBI set him up, charges dropped.
Sexual Misconduct Allegations and Investigations (Both Trump and Kavanaugh): No evidence or proof found whatsoever. Nor dates, times, whereabouts, or anything more specific than, "ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!"

I believe we've had enough attempted obstruction of the duly elected Administration. Having a political Executive Branch appointment appointed by the previous leader of the Executive Branch who was and still is clearly hostile to the current leader? Unacceptable. Buying into their claims of another investigation being needed? Unacceptable.

As I said, use the appropriate avenues. Send any evidence he has (there has to be proof a crime has committed before opening the investigation) to law enforcement or Congress. A state department employee is not, oddly enough, law enforcement. :)

Note also: The Inspector General of the State Department has a secondary title of "Assistant Secretary of State" and reports directly to the Secretary of State. AKA, Mike Pompeo. Not the other way around. His job is to determine sources of waste, fraud, etc. within the State Department, and communicate it to the Secretary of State. If the Secretary of State is involved, he is then at liberty to report his conclusions directly to the POTUS. It is NOT his job to announce intentions of opening investigations against his boss to Congress or the Press. Sorry.

Again, figure out what the fuck you're talking about.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on May 16 2020 10:02am
Member
Posts: 53,538
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 11,407.33
May 16 2020 10:03am
Quote (fender @ May 16 2020 11:51am)
true. uncritically buying into 'phony investigation' narratives, and making excuses for white nationalists trying to spread racist propaganda, however, is.

that's why you never accurately describe what you actually posted, just rephrase it in vague terms to pretend it's just harmless and agreeable positions. the sad thing is that you seem to think that's clever, when really it's just disingenuous and transparently stupid, lol.

Stating facts you don't like =/= uncritically buying into narratives

Criticizing a ridiculous piece you posted from a disreputable smear organization =/= making excuses for white nationalists trying to spread racist propaganda

That you would follow up that idiotic misrepresentation with "that's why you never accurately describe what you actually posted" is hilarious hypocrisy.

Posting your delusions and lies whenever I make a comment you don't like and can't refute is inappropriate and irrelevant.

How long do you think falsely accusing people of white nationalism and racism will suffice as a replacement for knowledge of subject matter and intelligent comments?
Do you think that is going well for you? Or is it just bolstering your reputation as a dishonest and angry late stage TDS anti-intellectual?
Member
Posts: 26,957
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
May 16 2020 10:07am
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

Quote (cambovenzi @ May 16 2020 09:03am)
Stating facts you don't like =/= uncritically buying into narratives

Criticizing a ridiculous piece you posted from a disreputable smear organization =/= making excuses for white nationalists trying to spread racist propaganda

That you would follow up that idiotic misrepresentation with "that's why you never accurately describe what you actually posted" is hilarious hypocrisy.

Posting your delusions and lies whenever I make a comment you don't like and can't refute is inappropriate and irrelevant.

How long do you think falsely accusing people of white nationalism and racism will suffice as a replacement for knowledge of subject matter and intelligent comments?
Do you think that is going well for you? Or is it just bolstering your reputation as a dishonest and angry late stage TDS anti-intellectual?


bro your double speak defending yourself is at an autistic savant level..
what???
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 16 2020 10:07am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 16 May 2020 17:56)
Russia Investigation: Nope, no collusion.


your defence already falls apart after your very first 'argument': whole idea of dismissing anything short of 'collusion' is moronic, and a cheap tactic to ignore the actual findings of the mueller report: it documents how trump not only invited, but actively encouraged russia to interfere with the 2016 elections on his behalf, and subsequently lied about it (repeatedly) to cover it up. strange how the party of self-declared patriots and conservative values has just agreed they are completely fine with their president doing that...

Member
Posts: 26,957
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
May 16 2020 10:11am
Quote (fender @ May 16 2020 09:07am)
your defence already falls apart after your very first 'argument': whole idea of dismissing anything short of 'collusion' is moronic, and a cheap tactic to ignore the actual findings of the mueller report: it documents how trump not only invited, but actively encouraged russia to interfere with the 2016 elections on his behalf, and subsequently lied about it (repeatedly) to cover it up. strange how the party of self-declared patriots and conservative values has just agreed they are completely fine with their president doing that...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDSepQXmgxs


yea its always great when the go "no collusion" nothing burger etc.
ITS THE OPPOSITE of that. But because Muller career R, refused to prosecute, they call it a victory. Forget how corrupt and an absolute POS trump and mob friends are they defend it.
yet they will constantly talk about "morals" its really astounding level disconnect.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 16 2020 10:18am
Quote (cambovenzi @ 16 May 2020 18:03)
Stating facts you don't like =/= uncritically buying into narratives

Criticizing a ridiculous piece you posted from a disreputable smear organization =/= making excuses for white nationalists trying to spread racist propaganda

That you would follow up that idiotic misrepresentation with "that's why you never accurately describe what you actually posted" is hilarious hypocrisy.

Posting your delusions and lies whenever I make a comment you don't like and can't refute is inappropriate and irrelevant.

How long do you think falsely accusing people of white nationalism and racism will suffice as a replacement for knowledge of subject matter and intelligent comments?
Do you think that is going well for you? Or is it just bolstering your reputation as a dishonest and angry late stage TDS anti-intellectual?


the problem with your pathetic attempts to backpedal regarding your defence of white nationalists is that you did not dispute the FACTS that were presented by the SPLC (namely that stephen miller was spreading white nationalist propaganda in form of a white genocide novel), but that you tried to RE-LABEL those actions by describing it as merely "recommending award winning books".

that's why you never comment on what you did directly, just dishonestly suggest you were merely "criticising a source", when in reality you were sugarcoating someone's pushing of white nationalist bullshit.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1388389390391392983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll