Quote (ampoo @ 27 May 2019 09:30)
you are the worst anti science guy in this entire forum, a consensus is not a fact
my main criticism is that large parts of researchers on that subject have abandoned critical thinking, they take any result as proof for their theory and politics and uninformed people with no opinion on their own like are not helping
its about lobbying and securing tax money instead of enlightenment
critical thinking is the foundation of science, however you climate fanatics dont allow thinking at all
just suggest that there are problems with these computer models and you will face public execution in the media
disagree even the slightest with the mainstream and you will get utterly excluded from any kind of discussion
that is not science, thats catholic church pre reformation style
your conspiracy theories are getting boring, as i said, countering lobbyism with lobbyism is not an argument
you do me wrong by the way, i did read the first pages of that "study" at breakfast and it does not address the problem
they take it for granted, renewables will do this and do that period
they talk about how renewables are cheaper than conventional power, then why do we have the ridiculous prices we have right now?
they take storage technology for granted that doesnt even exist
in a country like germany solar energy is not suited to be a main source of supply
my question still stands
since its impossible to store the energy we constantly need....how do YOU propose to supply our industry?
how will an aluminium producing plant for example get the several hundred thousand amperage they need 24/7 on a cold and dark january day?
you do realise that we have days where the production from wind and solar power is almost zero?
how do you even generate the massive energy needed to build shit loads of solar panels if you meet the demands of the greens?
but hey, maybe sand will melt into panels if we believe enough
jesus turned water into wine after all
you repeat phrases like ""experts" say...." like a trained monkey, how about some thinking of your own
sorry if thats too much
dodges the nazi part again to go on a non-sensical rant about 'critical thinking' to somehow muddy the waters and avoid addressing the simple truth about this issue.
your feelings about people calling you out for your science denial do however NOT change the facts about manmade global warming.
you're literally arguing like some flat-earther here, rambling about 'critical thinking' because the overwhelming evidence shows you're simply wrong...
but hey, everything to defend your little nazi party and their manmade climate change denial, right?
This post was edited by fender on May 27 2019 02:54am