black face is so funny.

It's twice as funny on Trudeau

yeah, he nogged it out of the park

In the Crystul Khyzer case, she prostituted herself out on backpage, then came up with the idea to rob and murder her pimp. He was sitting in a chair when she snuck up behind him, shot him in the head, stole his car and money and burned his house down to try to destroy the evidence. It was a premeditated, cold blooded murder. She had planned out the murder and taken several steps of premeditation, including downloading a police scanner app to listen to the response to the fire. When she was caught, she told a completely fake story about being pinned down and raped and killing him in self defense, but it was quickly exposed as a lie.

So in the mind of someone like Fender, "Running away while armed men try to chase you down and murder you, and shooting them in self defense while already on the ground being assaulted" is the same as "Carefully plan out a cold blooded murder, shoot someone from behind and try to destroy the evidence and tell a fake rape story".

Sounds like it was self-defense over the long term as opposed to an ephemeral moment. I'm not sure why this needs to be politicized so much given that self-defense is an unalienable right. We should applaud people who stop violence because it's the most American thing I can think of.

"Self-defense over the long term" sounds like one of those things you could do in biblical law at least
don't think it ever held much weight at The Hague

I think there are cases where it can apply. For instance, if someone abducted you and you end up killing your kidnapper, I think that's a legitimate form of self-defense (even if it's weeks later).

I think terms of the actual law, there would be this technical aspect that you could still be legally required to try to escape without killing your captor if that was an option. Take an example like Jayme Closs in Minnesota. A random weirdo saw her once and decided to kidnap her, walked into her home and blasted her parents with a shotgun and drove away holding her captive for 88 days. She eventually broke free because basically all he did to keep her locked up was put her under a bed and pile objects around it, so she pushed her way out and walked out to a stranger's home and called police. Now lets say that instead she had broken free, and decided to stay in his cabin and find his shotgun, lay in wait for him and murder him when he comes home. Under the letter of Minnesota law, she'd be guilty of 1st degree murder. We already had a laying-in-wait attempted self-defense case that resulted in a murder conviction around the same time. The law would clearly distinguish between 'killing in vengeance when you could have escaped bloodlessly' and 'laying in wait to murder someone'

Of course, this still boils down to what you can actually get a jury to convict on. Jurors are so biased around here that extremely clear-cut self-defense cases still get convicted, and I bet a clear-cut case of murder like the above would be set free. Jury nullification and juries disregarding the law to convict someone outweigh any technical argument. Look at the case of Allen Scarsella.

lmfaO.!

WTF

Kyle says he supports black lives matter on Tucker Carlson.