The idea that even the majority of billionaires have ordered people to be killed is hilarious... almost as hilarious as a couple rich kids telling you it. It provides an insight into the liberal mind... you've built up the idea in your head of the amoral, sociopathic rich guy.



Mike is a billionaire.. I wonder who he has ordered to be killed.

This post was edited by IceMage on May 29 2016 12:22pm

Rubio backing Trump just proves the Republicans can all get behind Trump.

The same can't be said about Hillary, the Dems continue to be divided.

It gives more insight into your own mind that you don't consider this a possibility. But you think the Kochs are actually libertarian, hard to beat that level of naive.

maybe it's because they aren't on board with Trump, Trump is on board with the GOP now.

I don't know if it's true, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least. They live in a different world, and have much more to lose than most people.

Billionaires don't need to kill people to become billionaires, or to maintain their wealth. The idea that a person with more money than they could ever spend in a lifetime would risk it all by killing off an enemy or competition is hilarious. Stop deflecting with the left's boogeyman.

Never said it was competition, or really anything you're saying I did. It's actually more difficult to maintain wealth than to make it. Theres a world of difference in culture between old and new wealthy families. I also never said this comes from rich kids. It's actually from my uncle's friends.

You're just being reactionary. If either of us is scared of a Boogeyman here it's you being scared of the left.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 29 2016 01:37pm

Then maybe you should clarify your statement? Cause what you said is completely retarded.

If I had a nickel for every time a PaRD member said reactionary, lol. You've been spoonfed talking points about the Koch brothers so in your mind they are the amoral, sociopathic rich guys. I don't care about them, especially when you are trying to deflect from your original, retarded point.

My point was that there's no way Donald Trump is as clean as he's made out to be compared to the Clintons. You took my statement out of context and went off the deep end.

I'm with ice on billionaires killing people but to your point I have no doubt Trump will be shown to be connected to people that buried enemies in cement during the 80s