Quote (dro94 @ Jun 15 2020 06:34pm)
A statue in a public place is there for people to revere, it is to show they led an exemplary life.
Having them on the street is validating that they are to be revered, whereas if you had them in a museum you can make the distinction that it's not in public viewing anymore because they weren't worthy of our respect.
Quote (dro94 @ Jun 15 2020 06:47pm)
There are statues in the UK of slavers who sent hundreds of thousands of Africans in chains to the US and did no discernable good other than donate some of that money to their cities to cement their legacy as a philanthropist.
I've never quite understood the obsession with revionist history regarding the Confederacy as noble Southern heritage. They were traitors that abandoned the US because they viewed owning slaves as their human right and they got slapped by the Union within 4 years.
I was born and raised in the north, by parents and grand parents that were born and raised in the north as well. However, I still don't think anyone should be destroying statues, paintings, movies, books, etc., because some folk might be offended.
IMO, offended is a state of mind. In itself there's nothing really offensive about a statue. This crap that's going on now is sort of like the book burning in Germany in WW II. It's just plain stupid. I'm sure that somewhere in the US there is a statue of George III, but I wouldn't be "offended" by it. It's just a statue about something that happened in history.
It's like the painting: Mona Lisa, believed to be Lisa del Gioconda 1479-1542. You can be pretty sure that she had slaves/servants. Are we gonna burn that too? Where does it stop?
Should we destroy anything that happens to offend anyone... Pretty soon there won't be anything left, and we'll all be back living oin tribes and spending our days killing each other over dumb shyt things, because there will be nothing left to remind us of previous mistakes.