Quote (fender @ May 2 2020 08:23am)
just like it is new yorkers' "choice" to live in a densely populated city, that is also the main hub for travel from europe, it's floridians' / alabamans' "choice" to live in a hurricane area. there's no reason for them to live there. how does it feel when your own idiot 'logic' bites you in the ass?
Well my excellent logic didn't bite me in the ass.
But here's the loopholes in YOUR logic. Florida and Alabam don't really have a choice...those WHOLE states are in the hurricane zone.
New Yorkers though, DO have a choice. You don't need 8.4 million people to run even three airports. They have a whole state to live in, that doesn't have them all living in each others back pockets.
New York's problem is that they have sanctuary cities, they refuse to move out of New York City, even though there is no longer a NEED to live there. They could leave say a million people in NYC and it would still be fine. The diffetrence being that when something like a coronavirus does happen, it won't spread like wildfire because there's too many people living there.
It's not like we can't SEE the results of having too many people in a city. We have Hong Kong and Japan for example, that are perfect examples. Unlike New York though, they don't have anywhere to move to. They're full up.