d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
Prev1372373374375376424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 36,671
Joined: Feb 19 2021
Gold: 31,677.46
Nov 20 2021 02:13pm
Quote (sirthom @ Nov 20 2021 02:05pm)
Good video, obvious there should be no charges on this case also.


I wish we could see what the first engagement looked like
The truck blocked it.
These are my takes

even though I don't thin kit has anything to do with the defenses self defense claim, if that's what they're going for..
Was following him illegal?
Was following with the guns illegal?
Was making kind of blockade to stop his movement illegal?

If the gun was never pointed at Armrey and he tried to take it away, there might be a case for self defense here.
There was only 1 of Armery, and 3 of the others. So Self defense is gonna be a tough one here. I don't think it will stand

This post was edited by lolkggz on Nov 20 2021 02:21pm
Member
Posts: 23,997
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Nov 20 2021 02:34pm
Quote (lolkggz @ Nov 20 2021 02:13pm)
I wish we could see what the first engagement looked like
The truck blocked it.
These are my takes

even though I don't thin kit has anything to do with the defenses self defense claim, if that's what they're going for..
Was following him illegal?
Was following with the guns illegal?
Was making kind of blockade to stop his movement illegal?

If the gun was never pointed at Armrey and he tried to take it away, there might be a case for self defense here.
There was only 1 of Armery, and 3 of the others. So Self defense is gonna be a tough one here. I don't think it will stand


He attacked, he got shot. The other stuff is circumstantial.
Member
Posts: 15,801
Joined: Jul 9 2021
Gold: 291.00
Nov 20 2021 02:36pm
Quote (lolkggz @ Nov 20 2021 12:13pm)
I wish we could see what the first engagement looked like
The truck blocked it.
These are my takes

even though I don't thin kit has anything to do with the defenses self defense claim, if that's what they're going for..
Was following him illegal?
Was following with the guns illegal?
Was making kind of blockade to stop his movement illegal?

If the gun was never pointed at Armrey and he tried to take it away, there might be a case for self defense here.
There was only 1 of Armery, and 3 of the others. So Self defense is gonna be a tough one here. I don't think it will stand


From the video I've seen, he was pulling on the shotgun and then punched the guy with the shotgun in the face (looked like it connected pretty good)

This post was edited by ChocolateCoveredGummyBears on Nov 20 2021 02:37pm
Member
Posts: 10,072
Joined: May 25 2008
Gold: 25,500.00
Nov 20 2021 03:03pm
Quote (Volcano @ Nov 19 2021 10:42pm)
Oh I'm sure you're not :rolleyes:

https://i.postimg.cc/bwsbKjSk/798905780l.gif



:rofl: That's a dodge right there.

Also, why do you keep editing your post after you reply, why not just say it all in 1 go right there? Seems like something the media themselves would do. Anderson Pooper and Don Lime would be proud of you.



Like I said I don’t follow mainstream media, I make logical decisions and arguments unlike my peers. And yesterday I was inbetween halo games when I was replying to your elegantly written posts. But why did you remove the judges accolades as not proving he’s fit for judging? What do you do for a living? Do you hear “no lettuce on my taco” daily?
And yes you have to prove the judge shouldn’t be involved in the trial rofl, that’s your whole argument isn’t it?
Member
Posts: 150,073
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 290.11
Nov 20 2021 03:18pm
Quote (SanduLungu @ Nov 19 2021 08:43pm)
Quick reminder: Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong. ^Fender ^Crunkt ^inkanddagger ^kenw ^Sixers ^NetflixAdaptationWidow hope I didn't miss anyone


Nothing wrong? He illegally carried a firearm at the age of 17, 100000% illegal in that state. This is not arguable.

His self defense was valid though.
Member
Posts: 6,041
Joined: Mar 6 2009
Gold: 0.01
Warn: 50%
Nov 20 2021 03:33pm
Quote (Sixers @ Nov 20 2021 03:18pm)
Nothing wrong? He illegally carried a firearm at the age of 17, 100000% illegal in that state. This is not arguable.

His self defense was valid though.


hahahahahhaah

You are 1000000% wrong.
Member
Posts: 40,721
Joined: Jan 9 2007
Gold: 83.00
Nov 20 2021 03:33pm
Quote (Sixers @ Nov 20 2021 04:18pm)
Nothing wrong? He illegally carried a firearm at the age of 17, 100000% illegal in that state. This is not arguable.

His self defense was valid though.


"Hours before closing arguments began on Monday, Judge Bruce Schroeder granted a defense motion to toss out the weapons charge. Rittenhouse attorneys Mark Richards and Corey Chirafisi pointed to an exception in the law that they said allows minors to possess shotguns and rifles as long as they’re not short-barreled."

Sup Swan.
Member
Posts: 6,041
Joined: Mar 6 2009
Gold: 0.01
Warn: 50%
Nov 20 2021 03:37pm
Quote (fuzzy159 @ Nov 20 2021 03:33pm)
"Hours before closing arguments began on Monday, Judge Bruce Schroeder granted a defense motion to toss out the weapons charge. Rittenhouse attorneys Mark Richards and Corey Chirafisi pointed to an exception in the law that they said allows minors to possess shotguns and rifles as long as they’re not short-barreled."

Sup Swan.


Don't beat him to hard with the truth, he might hurt himself in his confusion.
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Nov 19 2021
Gold: 0.00
Nov 20 2021 04:33pm
Not guilty... finally.

He had to take care of those low life "protestors". They were going to light businesses on fire and kill whoever wasn't part of their protest.


Justice was finally served.
Member
Posts: 11,344
Joined: Jul 2 2019
Gold: 2,170.00
Nov 20 2021 04:37pm
Quote (Sixers @ Nov 20 2021 09:18pm)
Nothing wrong? He illegally carried a firearm at the age of 17, 100000% illegal in that state. This is not arguable.

His self defense was valid though.


absolutely not lmao. he broke zero laws.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1372373374375376424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll