Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 11 2020 02:47pm)

When she signs a sworn statement it will be evidence, just weak evidence.

Thousands of people can testify to something and that doesn't constitute proof. To have real proof you need actual physical evidence.

If the tampering is as extreme as what you keep claiming why did the REPUBLICAN APPOINTED POLL WATCHERS WHO WERE PRESENT FOR ALL OF THIS not stop it and report it? Why are we continually relying on third person accounts? Why is the Trump team saying they weren't allowed to have poll watchers and then saying the exact opposite in court under oath?

The most likely reason is because there was no coordinated voter fraud, this was a totally normal election and Trump is trying to cast doubt on the process so he can retain popular support and keep power.

Quote (Thor123422 @ 11 Nov 2020 13:47)

When she signs a sworn statement it will be evidence, just weak evidence.

Thousands of people can testify to something and that doesn't constitute proof. To have real proof you need actual physical evidence.

If the tampering is as extreme as what you keep claiming why did the REPUBLICAN APPOINTED POLL WATCHERS WHO WERE PRESENT FOR ALL OF THIS not stopping it and reporting it? Why are we continually relying on third person accounts? Why is the Trump team saying they weren't allowed to have poll watchers and then saying the exact opposite in court under oath?

The most likely reason is because there was no coordinated voter fraud, this was a totally normal election and Trump is trying to cast doubt on the process so he can retain popular support and keep power.

Quote (Jere @ Nov 11 2020 02:35pm)

No evidence... It's shocking how the goal posts change

She gave an interview on Twitch and said she was supposed to do one with Hannity but the network producer cancelled it last min... She gives full account of her expierience here are a few key details..

I've also explained how the court process works, and as can see and will continue to see. My timeline of how the courts will approach the issue will remain accurate.

Quote

-While there observes anomalies in the counter on one of the tabulating machines

-When reported to her boss Nick Ikonomakis (VP and co-owner) he took her aside and said "the last thing we need is a problem, we are only here to assist with IT, not help them run elections"

-There were machines running

-If a reject ballot would not go thru the machine. There was a table that they called "duplicate ballots" for these

-Two guys were responsible for inputting information from that location into the computer.

-this whistleblower lady was republican, which she kept a secret.

-Also implicated in the mis-handling was City of Detroit employees and supervisors, including Daniel Baxter

-City was supposed to provide food for the workers. Vans were brought in.

-One of the workers happened to be an old acquaintance. He confided to her that they, they thought they were coming in to clean, but were then.

-There is an adjudication process for questionable ballots, which are viewed by a Republican and a Democrat.

-At one point Samuel Nick.

-Batches of 50 votes were bundled and then put in a steel locked box. These boxes were then stacked.

-Next day she made a report to the FBI. After a second call.

-After a few days her supervisor called asked for her resume and time sheets for the past week, and said he wanted her to work on some software upgrades.

Quote (Mangix @ 11 Nov 2020 13:53)

I amended the quote to show a more accurate reflection of what courts do. Obviously you're just quoting someone elses summary, but I'm just showing you the process if this were an affidavit since it is written very similar to a lot of the ones I've read so far.

Quote (Jere @ Nov 11 2020 02:54pm)

Decent wordsmithing.

Quote (Jere @ Nov 11 2020 01:50pm)

What is wrong with 3rd person account now? That what was used for the entire Russia collusion and eventually we found out the source was not reliable. So is your basis on the fact that in the past; sources for things of this nature have not been reliable or is it political bias? As you can see thousands of those 11,000+ that you mentioned can testify to something and it not mean it is proof, and then ignore that most of these affidavits are from poll watchers..

When it's announced I don't think you will take it so hard since I've been saying it for a while already.

Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 11 2020 07:57pm)

So third party accounts led to Russia gate but are fine now? It's telling that you made that comparison, because you think Russiagate is bullshit yet by your own admission now are relying on the same standard of evidence.

All of these affidavits may result in an audit or investigation, but are not evidence enough to conclude there was fraud without that investigation turning up significant evidence.

The issue here, is that you are concluding there is fraud without that investigation. You are taking the things that are the impetus to get more evidence, and assuming that evidence exists. If your position was "This should be investigated" instead of "This is all the evidence we need" we wouldn't all be calling you an idiot.

Quote (darkhead69 @ Nov 11 2020 08:57pm)

<iframe width="671" height="377" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8csentEYaGg" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Quote (Mangix @ 11 Nov 2020 13:56)

This is what happens in courts. I'm sorry if you're out of the loop on that. I didn't wordsmith anything. I struck out all the parts a court would.