Why would a person who was physically attacked, where the attacker attempted to take their shotgun, presumably to shoot them with it, apologize for the incidental discharge of their weapon? Again, watch the video.



This thread is proof of nothing, first off. Second, whether or not anything was stolen on the day of the incidental shooting is meaningless. They had a facebook group where they were sharing security risks in the neighborhood. This feller had maybe stolen things before. Multiple cases of breakins and stolen possessions, including firearms from vehicles were reported. There were issues here far beyond "Some jogger got water".

I'm not promoting a narrative. I'm promoting the idea that we allow the judicial system figure out what's real. As it stands now, you're promoting a narrative that is clearly false based solely on the video evidence available.

i love how you completely just abandoned the issue of you demanding 'proof' of only one side, demonstrating your bias in favour of the murderers and their scumbag apologists, and clumsily try to change the subject. you've been found out, bobby. drop the act, everybody knows where you stand anyway.

It has plenty of meaning, it means he didn't have a hammer.

You cannot prove that. You have no idea what evidence was recovered by police after the shooting. That has not been released.



Nobody demanded anything. I stated clearly and concisely that I'm on the side of the law. I watched the shooting video, I also watched the "evidence" videos of the diseased B&E. There's a lot there. And the fact that the B&E cameras were installed to try to catch a thief, not simply for fun, is something you ignore.

I hate this narrative shit. I'm honestly open to the idea that you had a couple guys looking for trouble. But your need to paint people as guilty without due process makes me WANT to take their side. Do you understand how fucking STUPID your posts are?

one of your fellow murder apologists already inb4'd that idiotic excuse. no decent person WANTS to defend killers just because they don't agree with a specific term that was used - even trying to sell that as an argument reveals where you want to land, while hilariously trying to maintain your 'open to either side' bs. it just further confirms i was right about which side you're already on.

There's no murder apologist. I'll say it now. This is another Brown-style case. You're going to be shown wrong, and even after you are, you're going to try to defend yourself via the opinion that "cause racism!". You're a shill. Nothing more. Stop talking, you're a fraud.

coming from a racist murder apologist who claims they WANT to take the side of the killers because they got triggered by other opinions, that's pretty rich. maybe take your own advice, since you've been exposed as the right wing hack you really are.

Here's the difference, "friend". I don't care if they're charged for murder. I don't care if they're executed. If that's what is determined to be just, then so be it.

You have this odd need for it to be not only murder, but racial in basis. You have an agenda. Do you realize how sad that is? If I were you, I'd spend some time reevaluating my life. Because damn.

it's not an 'agenda', it's just stating the obvious without cowardly hiding behind a flimsy "well we can't read their minds, so how could we possibly ever claim their motives" excuse. i mean, it's not like it hasn't got a long and 'proud' tradition in that neck of the woods, and it's not like that bias isn't proven every day by systematic and institutionalised discrimination, and by plenty of bigots like yourself happily making idiotic excuses for it, right?

if it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, i don't need an all white 'jury' to tell me "it could be an elephant, we will never know, and therefore simply can't say if it really is a duck - suuuper sorry for your loss, y'all."

when some racist scumbag claims that arbery might have dropped items on the side of the road, implying he must have committed a crime, and therefore deserved to be executed by some racist rednecks, you uncritically accept that - but when someone challenges that claim (which is a shitty and despicable 'excuse' to begin with) you all of a sudden need 'proof'. it's funny to me how you try to act like you didn't just give away your bias right there, lol.

https://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshh8Zc0Iy2hUr9aMz6y

cant link it but another video of Arbery being a criminal

DIN DU NUFFIN MY BOY WAS AN ANGEL AND WAS GONNA BE THE PRESIDENT HURRR DURR