1. There is not powers over other branches.. how is this so difficult. They are accorded their own powers. They are meant to keep in check other branches in this area they have a lot of powers in others they do not. Its the constitution. If you don't like that push for a re write of it.

2. Why do they gain power of impeachment.. HMMM again the f*&(*& constitution. Its part of their checks and balances power. Yes they have the right to start investigating before voting, that's how they come to a conclusion. They don't just sit in a room and say.. "we aren't going to ask ans questions, just everyone vote Yes/No"

3. HUH? Yes again, you questions baffle me it's not different than you stating.
Where does the Supreme Court get the powers to judge a contested law. WUT?

correct me if i'm wrong.
you're saying that "each individual" in the House "always" has power over the other branches? power and authority so great they do not need allow due process and can walk over constitutional rights at whim?

i'm sticking with "powers over other branches", because due process has not been afforded by the House.
Schiff has released phone records of individuals not even being linked to Trump. before the House vote.

Schiff was able to go above law and constitution without recognition from the House. just as an individual.

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Jan 27 2020 09:11am

I agree. I want to hear from Biden too.

NO no and no.
I'm starting to question if you are trolling or just cannot read. You are replying in a way that is exactly the opposite of what i stated. I never even spoke about "each individual"
What is your point?
To the specific point again for the 8th time THEY DO NOT NEED DUE PROCESS IT IS NOT A LEGAL ACTION> DUE PROCESS IS A LEGAL TERM. holy hell.
You think the House somehow defied the constitution. Prove it. The circle questions are boring AF already

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Jan 27 2020 09:11am

i've edited a bit in my prior post.

this was all the work of individuals until the impeachment inquiry vote. that was when they recognized themselves as "the House". every point before that was just individuals without recognized powers of impeachment.

Schiff releasing phone records of private citizens.

edit: on a lesser crime(imo), there was Schiff lying to Congress about contact with the Whistleblower before the whistleblower report. Schiff may not have been under oath, but if i'm not mistaken, it's still punishable to lie to Congress even not under oath.(normally at least)

edit 2: i have to work, so here's the reminder none of you actually needed.
trial picks back up @ 1pm est.


This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Jan 27 2020 09:31am

Due process in the judicial sense is not owed by the house. If it passes the house under the house rules it has followed due process by definition. The house could impeach a president for literally any reason and due process would have been followed.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jan 27 2020 09:31am

i'm not claiming that fully wrong. i'll get more into this later, i really do have to go asap

The fact that you always reference Fox as a NEWS source tells me all i need to know.
If you are REALLY talking about being truthful as a political figure. Just request tRump to be removed NOW. you are either for people speaking the truth or NOT.
Sorry tRump lies more than any pres. in history. again cult like.

Alan D claiming no crime is needed to impeach then now saying it needs to be crime-like. lol. im glad you idiots got your gag reflexes under control to choke that one down....

reading the number of armchair lawyers who couldnt pass a 6th grade civics test is always going to make me smile.

Posting fox new propaganda or circle dodging a point.... Whataboutism...

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/mitt-romney-increasingly-apparent-we-need-to-hear-from-john-bolton-77626949809

Here's the real deal of the day, will Mitt unlock the Mitch ?