d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Off-duty Dallas Cop Enters Wrong Apartment > Shoots And Kills The Resident
Prev1363738
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Dec 1 2018 08:37am
Quote (MizzouFTW @ Nov 30 2018 10:01pm)
You can't prosecute her on both charges. If you're going to prosecute her for manslaughter then you cannot prosecute for murder. If you are going to prosecute her for murder you cannot also prosecute her for manslaughter. You could if there were separate instances or more than one victim. So no, the fix is not in. They would be charging her twice for the same crime when the variables within the crime committed only allow for one charge. They can charge her with a plethora of other crimes to go along with the murder charge though.


The prosecution can request, and the judge can issue orders, that the jury consider the lesser included offense of manslaughter.

https://www.lawserver.com/law/state/texas/tx-codes/texas_code_of_criminal_procedure_37-09

Quote
An offense is a lesser included offense if: ******
(3) it differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less culpable mental state suffices to establish its commission;


The bold is key, as the main difference between manslaughter and murder is intent, which would be the culpable mental state referred to here.

Although I think you're right regarding the indictment, in that they can't indict on both manslaughter and murder for the same crime. And I think Thor is right, regarding the higher burden of proof being the one they charge cops with.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Dec 1 2018 10:35am
Quote (Surfpunk @ Dec 1 2018 09:37am)
The prosecution can request, and the judge can issue orders, that the jury consider the lesser included offense of manslaughter.

https://www.lawserver.com/law/state/texas/tx-codes/texas_code_of_criminal_procedure_37-09



The bold is key, as the main difference between manslaughter and murder is intent, which would be the culpable mental state referred to here.

Although I think you're right regarding the indictment, in that they can't indict on both manslaughter and murder for the same crime. And I think Thor is right, regarding the higher burden of proof being the one they charge cops with.


Why wouldn't they be able to? They prosecute for both first and second degree murder for the same offense, so that the jury may consider lesser states of mind in choosing to vote for one verdict over the other.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Dec 1 2018 10:38am
Quote (Santara @ Dec 1 2018 10:35am)
Why wouldn't they be able to? They prosecute for both first and second degree murder for the same offense, so that the jury may consider lesser states of mind in choosing to vote for one verdict over the other.


It may be a Texas law issue. I suppose I don't know for certain that they can't. I do know the judge can order the jury to consider the lesser included offense in Texas (among other states).
Member
Posts: 92,960
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Dec 1 2018 10:41am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Nov 30 2018 10:09pm)
One of the ways lawyers get cops off in situations like this, and this has happened several times in just the past few years on high profile cases, is they make sure the cop is brought up on charges that have a higher burden of proof than can be reasonably cleared in that case.

To convict her of murder would require that she intended him to die, or acted in such a negligent way that she knew him dieing was a possibility based on her actions. It's unlikely that the prosecution will be able to clear this burden since she thought she was in her own apartment and it wasn't premeditated in any way.

If they brought her up on manslaughter it's a much lower bar since all it requires is her making an avoidable mistake that resulted in his death, which would be pretty open and shut in this case.


which jurisdiction lets the defense lawyer choose the charge?

I get the flavor of what you're trying to say, but its the DA's fault due to public pressure.

if a lawyer walked into court and suggested their client was upcharged they'd get instantly sidebarred and possibly removed from council.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 1 2018 10:54am
Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 1 2018 10:41am)
which jurisdiction lets the defense lawyer choose the charge?

I get the flavor of what you're trying to say, but its the DA's fault due to public pressure.

if a lawyer walked into court and suggested their client was upcharged they'd get instantly sidebarred and possibly removed from council.


If the prosecutors are public instead of private

Might not be the case here though. However theres a reason they say if you go against the police you need to get a lawyer from out of state.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 1 2018 11:07am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1363738
Add Reply New Topic New Poll