Quote (Scaly @ Oct 4 2014 11:07am)
I can tell you why it's reasonable in one short post.
There is no conclusive evidence to support the existence of one particular God. Most (if not all) religions' holy books and scripture contain assertations we can verify through observation to be false. If belief in one particular god is not reasonable then belief in any god or gods to the exclusion of all others is also not reasonable. The only reasonable conclusion is to live life as if there is no god.
FYI metaphysical or not Christianity makes the claim that their god affects what happens in the physical world. If that is true there would be physical evidence to support that. There isn't.
Also - belief or non belief is not a choice. I do not choose to not be convinced by apologetics' arguments. They simply have not presented me with an argument that is convincing to me.
How would you know where the evidence is? The fact god/gods doesn't show themselves and the story of jesus or anything else is not sufficient?
If there is a divine force behind the universe, we would never know. Absence of evidence does not equal evidence. You can draw a conclusion on it and base your belief on it but it is not evidence that a god does or does not affect the universe.
Honestly that's the biggest philosophical dilemma in regards to god/gods and origins of the universe. If the universe has always existed, how can something have always existed. If the universe was created, what created the thing that created the universe and that reasoning goes on. I'm not sure we will ever be able to truly understand origins of our universe and the results after death can only be found out by dying.
This post was edited by sir_lance_bb on Oct 4 2014 10:20am