Why waste my time? You will just "translate" however you want.
I was under the impression you understood English... guess I was wrong.

Nah he only stuck his nose in her shirt. Gogo Joe

It's a binary question, i can't translate a binary answer. so u can say "yes" or "no". or you can once again leave me with something to translate. like this post, which translates to "boy you really got me, but im not gonna give you the satisfaction of confirming you're right, even tho we and everyone reading this know you're right".

Do you realize that if you keep using incorrect shoddy logic, your brain will... "get stuck like that".



/e Somewhere along the line, you came to the conclusion, that if you ask a question, someone HAS to answer it.

This post was edited by Ghot on Apr 14 2020 12:42pm

well i have to admit the proof of your existence is a strong argument in your favor.



actually i knew you wouldnt have the balls to answer, which is why i posted. fish in a barrel isnt fun but can pass the time. and in any case, you've answered.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Apr 14 2020 12:43pm

Are you quite sure you're not still in... 6th grade?

still too afraid to say you find the Biden accuser credible even though no PARD poster is surprised. its like not admitting you're fat with a t shirt on in the pool. everyone knows.

you can admit it and get a dash of respect, or deny it and no one is shocked you're once again running from the "point" you try to make via memes every day.

you keep calling me childish, but at least im not afraid to give my simple yes or no opinion like a little bitch because of what it might make a pack of actual kids (compared to my age) think about me, on an anon web forum no less. then again, if u dont have pard and the illusion of respect you somehow think you still have, what do you have?

queue *blah blah blah* meme

This post was edited by thesnipa on Apr 14 2020 01:00pm

Lemme get this straight. You want be to judge the veracity of the Biden accuser, with little to no evidence? Have I got that right?

The Kavanaugh accuser had little or no evidence either... BUT, the holding back of reporting it, Feinstein's involvement, and the fact that HER witnesses, all backed out. That tells me, there's something fishy going on.




Yet you want to trap me into answering a question with unknowable statistics. Then you reach even further, explaining that the question has a yes or no answer, which is patently, untrue.





Woot! Smackdown at the logic corral. :/

so when there was almost no evidence to exonerate or damn Roy Moore why did you argue so strongly that he was innocent?

i asked for your opinion, not the unknowable truth. just like you gave for Moore, your opinion. over and over, for days in a thread on the topic, in 2016.

strange how you can give your opinion for GOP candidates, but not for DNC candidates. just odd.

Already answered that like 2-3 years ago.

You need to get up earlier, bro. ^^