d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1366436653666366736685001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 8 2020 08:07pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Apr 8 2020 09:01pm)
Based on what I'm reading, you co-majored in Critical Theory and Gender Studies with a minor in Underwater Basket Weaving.

You do you though. :)


I actually majored in biochemistry and then did an M.S. in computational organic chemistry / biochemistry

and I love bragging about how smart I am because of it
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Apr 8 2020 08:14pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Apr 8 2020 07:07pm)
I actually majored in biochemistry and then did an M.S. in computational organic chemistry / biochemistry

and I love bragging about how smart I am because of it


Sweet! So that qualifies you for what, exactly, when it comes to refuting historical fact?

Historical fact: The Revolution was led by Southern Democrats. Had the democratic candidate won, vs Lincoln, it's possible the attempted succession and Civil War may not have happened. Granted, we'd be a much shittier country today.

Historical fact: The KKK was founded by ex-confederate soldiers and backed by southern democrats, and served to weaken the political power of the governing majority Republicans as well as the southern blacks.

Modern Day Fiction: The parties somehow "switched" so all the dirty deeds of the democrats are now the fault of republicans.

Now, keep on keeping on, feller. :)
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 8 2020 08:16pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Apr 8 2020 09:14pm)
Sweet! So that qualifies you for what, exactly, when it comes to refuting historical fact?
Historical fact: The Revolution was led by Southern Democrats. Had the democratic candidate won, vs Lincoln, it's possible the attempted succession and Civil War may not have happened. Granted, we'd be a much shittier country today.
Historical fact: The KKK was founded by ex-confederate soldiers and backed by southern democrats, and served to weaken the political power of the governing majority Republicans as well as the southern blacks.
Modern Day Fiction: The parties somehow "switched" so all the dirty deeds of the democrats are now the fault of republicans.
Now, keep on keeping on, feller. :)


So who did David Duke, the current Grand Wizard of the KKK, say he supported in the last presidential election? The politics of the 1800's are all well and good but we're in the year 2020.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Apr 8 2020 08:23pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Apr 8 2020 07:16pm)
So who did David Duke, the current Grand Wizard of the KKK, say he supported in the last presidential election? The politics of the 1800's are all well and good but we're in the year 2020.


So who claimed that Congressman Byrd, Democratic Senator and Grand Dragon of the KKK was their greatest mentor and oldest friend, and inspired their political career?

I mean, if I wanted to discredit you, sir, I'd simply start talking about how Ebola was caused by Trump and republicans, not to mention COVID19, the earth is flat, the moon landing was a hoax, and my fount of knowledge and greatest idol on JSP is Thor123422. The fact that somebody who Trump has never met threw out that he supports somebody makes no difference whatsoever.

It's entirely possible for two people who hate each other and wouldn't mind seeing each other die to support the same idea or person, due to that person's likely impact on their goals. Duke's stated goal at the time was the end of the One Earth open border policies that allows illegal aliens to abuse our social systems. Fine, whatever. The guy's a fruit, but agreed with one of Trump's policies enough to at least claim to support him. So what? That proves nothing other than that two things can be true. I realize your critical theory courses indicate everything is black and white (probably contributing to why democrats are so racist that everything's about race), but that's just not how it is. :)
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 8 2020 08:36pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Apr 8 2020 03:24pm)
Yeah, as we all know Trump has been a genuine leader. He's made swift and decisive decisions like closing the pandemic response unit and then saying he refuses to take responsibility.

You know what they say "The buck stops over there with Steve, I'll ask him why it was closed".

let's look at why you and snopes are manipulative and just wrong.
first, you are trying to mix different things into one. closing the "pandemic response team" and "refuses to take responsibility".

here's what was actually said, instead of giving it blanket meaning for everything.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/03/13/fauci_corrects_nbc_reporter_wanting_trump_to_take_responsibility_for_failing_i_was_talking_about_the_system.html#!
Quote
KRISTEN WELKER, NBC NEWS: Dr. Fauci said earlier this week that the lag in testing was in fact a failing. Do you take responsibility for that and when can you guarantee that every single American who needs a test will be able to have a test? What's the date of that?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Yeah. No, I don't take responsibility at all because we were given a set of circumstances and we were given rules, regulations, and specifications from a different time. It wasn't meant for this kind of an event with the kind of numbers that were talking about. And what we've done is redesigned it very quickly with the help of the people behind me and we are now in a very, very strong shape.

I think we'll be announcing, as I said Sunday night and this will start very quickly and we will have the ability to do in the millions over a very, very quick period of time. So no. And what we have done and we are going to be leaving a very indelible print for the future in case something like this happens again. But it was a--and that's not the fault of anybody. And frankly, the old system worked very well for smaller numbers, much smaller numbers, but not for these kind of numbers. Tony, maybe you'd like to say something.

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI, CHIEF OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH: So just to reiterate what I said to many of you multiple times, it's the descent (PH) of a system. The system was not designed--for what it was designed for it worked very well. The CDC designed a good system. If you want to get the kind of blanket testing and availability that anybody can get it or you could even do surveillance to find out what the penetrance is, you have to embrace the private sector. And this is exactly what you're seeing because you can't do it without it. When I said that, I meant the system was not designed for what we need. Now looking forward, the system will take care of it.


on to "firing the response team"
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-fire-pandemic-team/
Quote
Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer abruptly departed from his post leading the global health security team on the National Security Council in May 2018 amid a reorganization of the council by then-National Security Advisor John Bolton, and Ziemer’s team was disbanded. Tom Bossert, whom the Washington Post reported “had called for a comprehensive biodefense strategy against pandemics and biological attacks,” had been fired one month prior.

It’s thus true that the Trump administration axed the executive branch team responsible for coordinating a response to a pandemic and did not replace it, eliminating Ziemer’s position and reassigning others, although Bolton was the executive at the top of the National Security Council chain of command at the time.

it's your claim, as well as others, that Trump has failed us for not filling this position. the positions are bogus and being done by other positions with other bogus names instead. the responsibilities were still being addressed, as i can show you now.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/03/17/no_the_white_house_didnt_dissolve_its_pandemic_response_office_142683.html
Quote
When I joined the National Security Council staff in 2018, I inherited a strong and skilled staff in the counterproliferation and biodefense directorate. This team of national experts together drafted the National Biodefense Strategy of 2018 and an accompanying national security presidential memorandum to implement it; an executive order to modernize influenza vaccines; and coordinated the United States’ response to the Ebola epidemic in Congo, which was ultimately defeated in 2020.

It is true that the Trump administration has seen fit to shrink the NSC staff. But the bloat that occurred under the previous administration clearly needed a correction. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, congressional oversight committees and members of the Obama administration itself all agreed the NSC was too large and too operationally focused (a departure from its traditional role coordinating executive branch activity). As The Post reported in 2015, from the Clinton administration to the Obama administration’s second term, the NSC’s staff “had quadrupled in size, to nearly 400 people.” That is why Trump began streamlining the NSC staff in 2017.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-support-national-biodefense/
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-modernizing-influenza-vaccines-united-states-promote-national-security-public-health/

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Apr 8 2020 08:42pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 8 2020 08:56pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Apr 8 2020 09:23pm)
So who claimed that Congressman Byrd, Democratic Senator and Grand Dragon of the KKK was their greatest mentor and oldest friend, and inspired their political career?

I mean, if I wanted to discredit you, sir, I'd simply start talking about how Ebola was caused by Trump and republicans, not to mention COVID19, the earth is flat, the moon landing was a hoax, and my fount of knowledge and greatest idol on JSP is Thor123422. The fact that somebody who Trump has never met threw out that he supports somebody makes no difference whatsoever.

It's entirely possible for two people who hate each other and wouldn't mind seeing each other die to support the same idea or person, due to that person's likely impact on their goals. Duke's stated goal at the time was the end of the One Earth open border policies that allows illegal aliens to abuse our social systems. Fine, whatever. The guy's a fruit, but agreed with one of Trump's policies enough to at least claim to support him. So what? That proves nothing other than that two things can be true. I realize your critical theory courses indicate everything is black and white (probably contributing to why democrats are so racist that everything's about race), but that's just not how it is. :)


And who does the KKK in general support then? (Hint: it's not Democrats)

I love the whataboutism for Hillary, then the immediate backpedaling on the association between a groups.

It only took me two posts to get you to abandon the importance of the "party of the KKK" talking point so you could talk about Hillary. lol
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Apr 8 2020 09:04pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Apr 8 2020 07:56pm)
And who does the KKK in general support then? (Hint: it's not Democrats)

I love the whataboutism for Hillary, then the immediate backpedaling on the association between a groups.

It only took me two posts to get you to abandon the importance of the "party of the KKK" talking point so you could talk about Hillary. lol


I don't care who the KKK supports, because I don't care about the KKK.

You talk about the politics of the 1800's and early 1900's but fail to understand: The KKK doesn't have millions of members, political power, or any real voice. The KKK is not violent, or a criminal entity. They're stupid people who say mean things. And most of their stated goals run along the lines of, "Well... We may have browns and blacks and Jews, but at least they're OUR browns and blacks and Jews. Since we can't hang 'em, we should at least turn them into one of US, so they become less brown or black or jew! But these other fiendish and filthy nonhumans must go!"

That's simply not reflective of anything anyone else believes. And there are what, some three thousand to seven thousand KKK members in the US? This is not something like the Democratic-driven KKK with millions of members of the past. This is a fringe group that does no violence and really has no voice. The little time they're given simply shows them as asinine pipsqueaks easily ignored. It's their right to speak their mind without reprisal, so they do, and that's that. Who gives a fuck?

And there's no "whataboutism". Hillary literally publically stated her idolism of a KKK grand dragon and YOU are excusing it. Me? I don't honestly care. I know she's a snake. One thing more or less doesn't change things. If she were a snake who stood for the working class? She would have won 2016.

And no, I'm still talking about the KKK quite squarely. You never were. You were attempting to put Trump in the same box as the KKK, when he has no dealings with them. And you got your gaping pussy hurt the moment Hillary's outright idolism of a confirmed leader of the KKK was pointed out.

You lack consistency. As with all critical theory majors.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 8 2020 09:19pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Apr 8 2020 10:04pm)
I don't care who the KKK supports, because I don't care about the KKK.

You talk about the politics of the 1800's and early 1900's but fail to understand: The KKK doesn't have millions of members, political power, or any real voice. The KKK is not violent, or a criminal entity. They're stupid people who say mean things. And most of their stated goals run along the lines of, "Well... We may have browns and blacks and Jews, but at least they're OUR browns and blacks and Jews. Since we can't hang 'em, we should at least turn them into one of US, so they become less brown or black or jew! But these other fiendish and filthy nonhumans must go!"

That's simply not reflective of anything anyone else believes. And there are what, some three thousand to seven thousand KKK members in the US? This is not something like the Democratic-driven KKK with millions of members of the past. This is a fringe group that does no violence and really has no voice. The little time they're given simply shows them as asinine pipsqueaks easily ignored. It's their right to speak their mind without reprisal, so they do, and that's that. Who gives a fuck?

And there's no "whataboutism". Hillary literally publically stated her idolism of a KKK grand dragon and YOU are excusing it. Me? I don't honestly care. I know she's a snake. One thing more or less doesn't change things. If she were a snake who stood for the working class? She would have won 2016.

And no, I'm still talking about the KKK quite squarely. You never were. You were attempting to put Trump in the same box as the KKK, when he has no dealings with them. And you got your gaping pussy hurt the moment Hillary's outright idolism of a confirmed leader of the KKK was pointed out.

You lack consistency. As with all critical theory majors.


Damn, it seems you are genuinely not able to follow a conversation for even a few posts. I wasn't trying to lump Trump with anything. I was pointing out that there has been a political realignment, and the KKK currently supports the Republican Party. So your "party of the KKK" bullshit can just go fuck itself.



It seems when challenged your default tactic is to just spam as many stupid claims as possible so you can avoid having to own up to any one mistake.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Apr 8 2020 09:19pm
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Apr 8 2020 09:32pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Apr 8 2020 08:19pm)
Damn, it seems you are genuinely not able to follow a conversation for even a few posts. I wasn't trying to lump Trump with anything. I was pointing out that there has been a political realignment, and the KKK currently supports the Republican Party. So your "party of the KKK" bullshit can just go fuck itself.

It seems when challenged your default tactic is to just spam as many stupid claims as possible so you can avoid having to own up to any one mistake.


First, you never stated there was political realignment, but I already addressed that, and your mythical tooth fairy of "Republicans are at fault for the actions of Democrats" has already been addressed.

It seems when challenged your tactic is simply to pretend the rest of the conversation never existed, and you've magically won some kind of mythical "point" over some mythical "reversal".

As I said, let go of critical theory for a while. The primary reason I'm an Independent is so I can stick with the policies and not judge the parties by yesterday. Merely by how they benefit the working class TODAY. And right now, TODAY (at least, the today the day before lockdown went into place) the working class is in a MUCH better place than it was in 2016. There are more jobs, they're paying more, and they're being taxed less. Purchasing power is up, the economy is up, quite literally everything is better. Now, if you talk TODAY TODAY, COVID19 is destroying everything, except it's not. Panic-stricken anti-trumpers seem to be driving more policy than the CDC, and the people who're going to suffer, as usual, from EVERY leftist action, is the working class.

Meantime, you're talking about how naughty Trump is with the Stimulus, and I'm thinking, "Man, $2400 between Sarah and I means we can avoid being evicted for 2 extra months while we have next to no work income due to hour cuts." It doesn't matter to you because you don't live in the real world. Neither do your Antifa buddies, neither do any of your little friends and/or supporters who have parents with six figures in the bank. You aren't on the bottom end. Stop trying to speak for the bottom end.

This COVID shit goes on for more than a few months longer, we'll lose our home, our ability to legally drive our vehicles, our health insurance, quite literally everything. AND due to contractual obligations, we'll go into debts we probably won't be able to pay. This has REAL impact on us. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about with your talk of "irresponsible stimulus". If it weren't for the stimulus, I'd gladly stab you in the back, steal your wallet, and pay my rent, because I don't give a fuck about you. And THAT, friend, is what YOU should start to worry about. :)
Member
Posts: 54,185
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Apr 8 2020 09:36pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1366436653666366736685001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll